Skip to main content
An Orthodox death of wisdom

Wisdom homes in a creature who
knows how to sense; either by reason or by appetite. There is no difference between a fool person and a beast, in fact, a beast knows his periled history more than a fool. Human being might claim themselves as a reasonable creature, but their pursuit of knowledge is even worse than a beast; since a beast has no sense of blind custom, instead their sensuality is a primary source to know what is good or bad for them. But the mankind, who is the champion of innate reason, is running after theological or parochial customs.  Customary or conventional morality is developed by a few for their advantages, but unfortunately these customs are blindly followed by the majority in the name of theological, or political morality. However, there is a difference between following what appears just and reasonable and what is received passively without applying any reason. Reason and sense are two sovereigns for any epistemological inquiry for a person, while reason is a gift of nature to the mankind unlike a beast, though, mankind is responsible for its depletions. More you blow with emotions your reason sleeps, and once your emotions lead to arrogance reason wither away forever. Reason is nothing but the sixth sense of a person what is lacking in a beast, but a beast is a better empiricist than a person. At least, they observe better than us in case of probable danger knocks the door.
Our source of wisdom is based upon heresy materials; those sources are far away from our perceptibility through senses, running against reasonable analysis of a human’s mind, though opinions are formed as if no other opinion could stand against its truthfulness. Self-claimed infallibility is the most fallacious thought, damaged the credibility of humankind as the novel creature. In fact, mankind is the biggest offender of liberty; be it animals, or weak members of mankind’s community, wicked persons know how to manipulate the freedom of other weak creatures. As Swami Vivekananda rightly says “strength is a life and weakness is a death.” It is the death of reason which weakens the mankind, however other animals are considered weak or strong by their physical strengths. Here we need to ask that who the biggest killer of the mankind’s strength is? It is none other than those professional liars who cultivate the myth for the sake of their own advantages, for them, cultivation of a truth is a deprivation of their source of authority. Their wisdom is unparalleled and unquestionable. Interestingly, majority follows what blows from so called higher sources; a half-truth of few is represented as a gospel truth of the whole society, and minority voices are crucified as if they are treacherous and adulterous, though their sense of wisdom is capable to silence the whole mankind. Socrates was persecuted for his views what were called immoral and irreligious views. Majority was blowing with the pathos of Sophists though Socrates was one voice, gritty and fearless. He died for the sake of sacred truth. No one can be a great thinker who does not recognize that as a thinker it is his first duty to follow his intellect to whatever conclusions it may lead (J.S. Mill, On Liberty, 1859). Socrates did follow his reason instead of overflow of pathos. Even Gandhi did value experimentations with truth instead of preaching what he does not believe (Akeel Bilgrami, Gandhi, the Philosopher, 2003). There is nothing called absolute truth; it passes through various thesis and its legitimatisation as a truth appears only when contrary arguments die in front of it (J.S. Mill, On Liberty, 1859). Truth gains more even by the errors of one who, with due study and preparation, thinks for himself than by the true opinions of those who only hold them because they do not suffer themselves to think (J.S. Mill, On Liberty, 1859). Why do we fear to stand against orthodoxy? Are we loosing courage day by day? Or is it orthodoxy killing common sense of a man, depleting reason of us, and our courage is succumbing to death? It is unorthodoxy in thinking that could show sunlight to the prisoners of platonic cave, so that, the beauty of this universe could be realized, myths could be unravelled, and perpetual peace could be achieved for the betterment of mankind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...
Post a Comment
Read more

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Glory of Belief Industry

Disappearance of questions is the pre-condition of artificial certainty. Therefore, it is profitable investment to establish and sustain the belief industry. This industry produces the efficient Man whose substratum is not the divine soul or mental faculty but a non-thinking mind which militantly conform the group solidarity of the masses. When answers are easily available and generated by the Artificial Intelligence, who will take the pain for thinking and unthinking or deliberating to develop logical capacity or for establishing the paradigm of truth? As Ashis Nandy explains the creative process which requires to meditate with the questions and to remain with the questions for a longer period of time to create and unveil the mask of deception. The artistry in epistemic creativity necessitates the patience caring of the questions. The cultivation and exploration of questions and mitigated skepticism to unravel what is said and unsaid, the expressions and silences. Even so called Dark ...
Post a Comment
Read more