Skip to main content

Burden of Name and Identity

Picture's Courtesy: Pinterest

Descartes rightly said that "I think therefore I am". Thinking was the first condition of name and identity, often taken too seriously like a burden to carry on in spite of all the inconveniences one has to face in the journey of life. Name is just like an image, referred to denote the archive of men made of flesh and bones like any other carbon material. Greatness doesn't belong to real entity, composed  of five elements of nature, rather it is an end product of thought and conditioning, responsible to establish a subordinated culture and mental slavery. One carries all too burden of name, the fossils of identity, and projects over the lively reality so as to blur the distinction between life and death. Identity is defragmented past, haunts the freshness of presence forever. One which could be identified as name, concept, or category is a thing without freshness of uncertainty. How come one remains one single name even if many cells or many bodies, embodied by a being, replace itself and transform into each-other? How difficult it is to rely on concept even if the subject of concept is in flux? Every desire of truthfulness is the fruit of memory, resides in the nostalgia of coherence like a fixed pattern, afraid of change. Every moral concept is a desire, produced by thought, to overpower the change, which is one and only law, applicable in the world of conventional reality. I wonder if I am not the same person what I was just a moment ago, how do I fit into the category of unit, known as subject? I am not the dead subject but an open possibility to embrace the change, a possibility like alive breezing, quite similar to the freshness of raindrops, unlike an archive of historicity; I am not a thing to be owned and possessed. No wage can justify the equivalence of the freshness and innocence of freedom. Child is an open possibility, for no name or identity is burdensome enough to subdue the innocence of stillborn mind. One who loves freedom must relive oneself from the dichotomy of master-servant relationship. Relationship, if at all a name to rely upon, must be a synonym of dialogic culture without getting subordinated in the culture of name and identity. As Habermas rightly explained about the "communicative reason" as the foundation of democratic ethos. Every single division, between person and very important person, between master and employee, between producer and consumer, is synonymous to un-freedoms, which is cultured and schooled since the first experience of consciousness a child is exposed to. The burden of name is antithesis to life and freshness. One who is unknown is alive like a plant, dancing in tune of wind, without caring about weight of existence. A saint is like fresh air, unlike Alexander, craving for a fictitious achievement, remains forever a symbol of "archive fever" (Jacques Derrida).



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet

Same Sex Marriage Verdict: Apolitical Politics of Court

Every judgment of the Constitutional court solves and unsolves certain fundamental questions. Court often takes two steps forward and one step backward (Shklar). Navtej Johar was rightly celebrated as a progressive judgment which recognised same sex relationships on the touchstone of constitutional morality. In a way, judgment progressively explored the colonial and post-colonial politics and reviewed Section 377, IPC from the perspective of constitutional morality emanating from the "objective purposive interpretation",  a concept devised by Justice Aharon Barack, a former judge of Israel Supreme Court. NALSA judgment already went ahead with the recommendations to broaden the scope of reservation policy in India to allow the constitutional protection of sexual minorities. The latest judgment has attracted widespread criticism from the intellectuals. Many of them have argued that the Court has not taken its responsibility in protecting the rights of sexual minorities. There i

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the