Skip to main content

Knowledge, Learning, and Pragmatism: Reversal of Platonic Certitude of Ideas



Picture's Courtesy: Google Books

I have heard people saying 'be practical'. I often think about this advice and find many puzzling answers: what is practical?

Practicality may be a principle that emphasizes the importance of practice rather than having merely a 'museum of ideas'. The ownership over ideas without practice is as useful as forgetting the art of archery when the enemy is ready to blow the existence, something akin to Karna story in Mahabharata. The question of significance is if practicality can have life without the ideas or ideals? Practicality is, in fact, dependent upon some ideals, which make it practical in the first place. In that sense, the dichotomy of idealism and pragmatism is to be revised in terms of their differences as conceptual categories. 

In American school of thought, Charles Sanders Pierce, William James, and John Dewey developed the thesis of Pragmatism which has gained its popularity in Rorty age (Richard Rorty, one of the last defenders of Pragmatism made it an epochal transformation with his expositions through literary adventures). 

The ancient example of pragmatism could be found in Buddha who neglected many metaphysical questions and focused on the question to liberate humankind from the living reality of dukha (suffering). He raised the practical problems like a person suffering from thirst doesn't contemplate the nature of water rather chooses an existential act to quench the thirst. A person on death bed doesn't value any possession or ownership rather opts to pass away with less pain and suffering. 

Our knowledge is just a culmination of demands and exigencies from which our world passes through. All the conceptual creation doesn't emanate out of nothing. It has grounding in a situation or puzzle which requires an effective solution. All the major discoveries and inventions happened in the world to address some questions or problems. Knowledge has a constitutive element which reflects the creativity of human species as an agent exposed to facticity and desires transcendence (Jean Paul Sartre). It is not just a spectator's approach to observe and discover the law of nature as believed by many metaphysians. Rather humans have got the creative skills from nature to create knowledge under a particular condition or situation in which the personal preferences and biasness remain in the hypothesis one creates and tests through induction of experiences.  

Knowledge and learning for human species are not merely a fancy urge rather these are the existential necessities to foster the values in newcomers and perpetuate the 'will to life' (Arthur Schopenhauer). John Dewey in his Democracy and Education demonstrated the urge of education as a progressive process to instill values in children, so that the culture in which the adult is grown and progressed could be transmitted to a younger one. Education, in that sense, has a pragmatic potential to perpetuate human culture and their institutions in new forms, even though the finite reality is the fact of an individual life.

Pragmatism revises the idea of truth, since the history of the idea has exposed its fallibility and restricts the scope of knowledge to verification and satisfaction of the agent, who is inquiring about the problem. No one can claim its historical standing and spatial validity. The nature of science, though stands on cooperative research and institutionalisation of critical method, cannot provide the indubitable proposition in the Cartesian sense. At least, the history of ideas exposes the harsh reality of this. But science as a particular method has definitely outsmarted the other methods of inquiry, hence its method is often relied on in solving the puzzling issues on which the human community contemplates to find out the solutions. Pragmatism, in this sense, has contributed in making epistemology an activity of action and clarification. It is an ordinary act like 'speech act' (Ludwig Wittgenstein) or political action which has evolved in human species and has helped in making the human community adapting in adverse natural and social conditions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Imagination

Student: I want to excel in my life. Over the years, my graph of success is achieving a new height. I am doing hard work to become one of the smartest and richest persons on the Earth. Teacher: Wonderful! Who is  achiever and what is achieved? Student: I am the achiever. My name and fame are shining day by day.  Teacher: Who is this ‘I’? What is the material by which it is produced? Student: I is the ego which is the agent achieving successes and facing failures. Teacher: Whether ego is real or imaginary? Student: It is made of name, form, and function. Teacher: Whether name, form, and function are eternal?  Student: No, they are changing. Teacher: Anything changes does it exist? Whether these are real or merely fictitious images appearing and disappearing before the sightscreen of mind? Student: They are the images constructing my identity as a person. Teacher: Well said! What is the stuff by which these images are made of? Who is maker and what is made? Student: They ar...

पिरोता जाऊँ एक माला ज़िन्दगी का

पढ़ता हूँ हर एक दिन एक ही पन्ना, हर दिन हज़ार ये मालूम पड़ते हैं। जबसे होश संभाला है एक ही पन्ना सवांरते आया हूँ, लोग इसे ज़िन्दगी कहते हैं। इसपे लिखे हर एक लब्ज़ जो मेरे मालूम पड़ते हैं, ना जाने कितने जुबां पे चढ़े होंगे। आज हम भी कुछ पल के लिए ही सही इसके सारथी हैं, जाने से पहले कुछ रंग मेरा भी इसपे चढ़ जाए, बस इसीलिए एक ही पन्ना बार बार पलटता रहता हूँ। हर कोई अनजाने किताब की तलाश में बाहर निकलता है, जिसका हर एक पन्ना वो ख़ुद है। जब ख़ुद के रंग को समझ ही ना पाया, तो भला इंद्रधनुषी किताब के क्या मायने हैं? अस्तित्व में ना जाने कितने पन्ने बिखरे पड़े हैं, बस एक से ही अवगत हो जाऊँ, उसके हर एक शब्द को चुनता जाऊँ, कुछ पल के लिये सही, पिरोता जाऊँ एक माला ज़िन्दगी का।

Human's Rationality: Its Unfree-Freedoms

Cosmic energy is moving into various forms and patterns, its quest is to become, what Arthur Schopenhauer called 'will to live'.  (Arthur Schopenhauer, 1818). He is explicit that: “Thus the will to live everywhere preys upon itself, and in different forms is its own nourishment, till finally the human race, because it subdues all the others, regards nature as a manufactory for its own use. Yet even the human race...reveals in itself with most terrible distinctness this conflict, this variance of the will with itself…”. Every ‘will to become' is a movement, encompassing the history of past and future; the degree of rationality and its gradation are normativized by thoughts as hierarchy of souls and monads. Human being as likeness and image of God possess the highest truth, indeed! In fact, human being is the only species who possess and owns the truth, it is the only mode of being who puts truth at stake, constructs its horizons and claim of legitimacy and illegitimacy, defi...