Skip to main content

WHY KNOWLEDGE IS NOT MERELY AN ACCUMULATED BASKET OF INFORMATIONS




One of my friends is fond of "absurdity" as a philosophical concept, originited, as per my knowledge and belief, through the works of great novelist Albert Camus. His famous book, The Myth of Sisiphus, is no ordinary work. That kind of work requires the great concentration and observation of life at its subtle best. Thinkers, like Buddha, Camus, Sartre, J. Krishnamurti, Osho, and even movie like Lucy move into the direction of absurdity of life, though each one has own way of looking knowledge and belief system in our life. But I do believe the story never ends simply by prophecising about the death of knowledge, what Prof. Baxi exclaims, "epystemocide". Knowing is still relevant though knowledge is not necessarily all about informations. In the era of global village no fact has enough space to breathe independently, sometimes manufacturer and cultivators of informations do find social media as a medium to spread hatred and contempt against humanities.

Lucy is a wonderful movie. This movie shows one important thing, the more we know the less we feel away from it. I'm pretty sure that the quest of learning does increase in proportion of knowledge. And of course, there is no end of it. The question is ultimately that what we know is more or less theoretically composed than practically engaged one. Like hearsay evidence, we are more inclined to leap over what is said or written than observed. One reason can be attributed to the very classical philosophy which has an essentializing tendencies to reach near universalization, quantification, verification as per utilitarian calculus, and even people like Rousseau, Kant, or Hegel for that matter does not avoid theorising for the sake of humankind. Even though all those theoretical conclusions are not obvious for every human being. Critical thinkers like Marx, in spite of his materialistic vision, is trapped in the old school vision of searching the universal law in social behaviour and evolution, and reached to the false conclusion, like in his own term, false consciousness. 

Knowledge and to pursue it is unlike hemlock and a never ending task. And to be alive and survive require at least two important pursuits; knowing and having faith over knowable and unknowable. That's also a way to excell in life, and to be engaged in quest of eliminating all sorts of injustices, violence, etc. Nobody knows about a life after this. This life could be lived in a meaningful way if one dares to give a meaning in a way that would provide peace in mind and joy in heart. No being on this Earth is dearth of this wisdom of knowing, and of course, the accumulation of facts are not what I mean by knowing. Knowing is something which is useful for our existence, of limb and consciousness. Knowing is prerequisite for every single animal, including humans to find life and its meaning. Absurdity is not a good way to end here. Even though, it's equally true that we can't exhaust upto a certain limit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet

Same Sex Marriage Verdict: Apolitical Politics of Court

Every judgment of the Constitutional court solves and unsolves certain fundamental questions. Court often takes two steps forward and one step backward (Shklar). Navtej Johar was rightly celebrated as a progressive judgment which recognised same sex relationships on the touchstone of constitutional morality. In a way, judgment progressively explored the colonial and post-colonial politics and reviewed Section 377, IPC from the perspective of constitutional morality emanating from the "objective purposive interpretation",  a concept devised by Justice Aharon Barack, a former judge of Israel Supreme Court. NALSA judgment already went ahead with the recommendations to broaden the scope of reservation policy in India to allow the constitutional protection of sexual minorities. The latest judgment has attracted widespread criticism from the intellectuals. Many of them have argued that the Court has not taken its responsibility in protecting the rights of sexual minorities. There i

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the