Skip to main content

Samkhya and Cartesian Dualism

Descartes was the father of modern science. His vision of mind-body dualism (known as Cartesian dualism) led the foundation of science, which is based upon a dualistic conception of observer and observed. Descartes was a rationalist who did thought experiment to reach at the conclusion that Mind, Body (external nature), and God exist. Because no finite being could possibly exist without infinite reality. Newton went further and ensured to displace God from the realm of natural cosmic reality. But the central proposition of mind-body dualism remained as the foundation of modern science. Francis Bacon claimed that "we must put nature to rack to compel it to answer our questions". Here "We" denotes the reality of a rational mind, which is not subjected to the law of cosmos. Cosmos is a machine for Descartes, which is governed by mechanical law. On the contrary, mind is free from the bondage of mechanical law. It has freedom of will in Kantian systems of ethics. Because, human mind is capable to free itself from the regulated laws of cosmos.


Samkhya, on the contrary, is an enumerative tradition of philosophy which is the most old philosophical tradition in India. Kapil is credited for its origin. Samkhya is believed by many as non-vedic origin, but some scholars trace out its origin in Vedas, Brahman, and Upanishads. This philosophical tradition has unique blend of Upnishad's permanence in nature of Purusha (supreme consciousness) and Buddhist momentariness (Prakrati). Samkhaya considers that worldy reality consists of Purusha and Prakriti; conscious invisible reality and unconscious manifested reality. Prakriti has 25 Tattvas (elements), includes Mind, Intellect, and Ego. Contrary to Cartesian dualism, Samkhya treats mind (mann), Intellect (Buddhi), and Ego (Ahamkaar) as unconscious material reality. Mind is unconscious apparatus which may illuminate by Purusha's capacity to observe its limitation and material process of its equilibrium. As Samkhya propounds that all Prakriti is a composition of three gunas (qualities) Sat, Rajas, and Tamas. In case of disequilibrium of these three components the possibility of ego, or being appears. Prakriti, in that sense, is the source of the perceived world of being and becoming. It changes and its reality could be perceived by Purusha through Pratyaksha (perception), Anumana (inference), and Shabd (word). These are different sources of Jnana. Shantiparvan of Mahabharat ably depicts the importance of Jnana Yoga, because the liberation from ignorance is the true nature of Buddha. Samkhya has a vision to liberate the consciousness from the bondage of attachment which appears in treatment of Prakriti as real self. And one who observes the limitation and change of Prakriti does not get involved in the cacophony of existence. Samkhya is a great teacher, in a way, to instruct a vision to know that the biggest prison is ever made is our own mind. To liberate from it one has to remain vigilant through mind within mind  about mind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet
1 comment
Read more

Same Sex Marriage Verdict: Apolitical Politics of Court

Every judgment of the Constitutional court solves and unsolves certain fundamental questions. Court often takes two steps forward and one step backward (Shklar). Navtej Johar was rightly celebrated as a progressive judgment which recognised same sex relationships on the touchstone of constitutional morality. In a way, judgment progressively explored the colonial and post-colonial politics and reviewed Section 377, IPC from the perspective of constitutional morality emanating from the "objective purposive interpretation",  a concept devised by Justice Aharon Barack, a former judge of Israel Supreme Court. NALSA judgment already went ahead with the recommendations to broaden the scope of reservation policy in India to allow the constitutional protection of sexual minorities. The latest judgment has attracted widespread criticism from the intellectuals. Many of them have argued that the Court has not taken its responsibility in protecting the rights of sexual minorities. There i
Post a Comment
Read more

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the
Post a Comment
Read more