Skip to main content

Random Reflection on Belief and Truth

In an interview with BBC when Bertrand Russell was asked about his life long learned experience if he would like to share with his descendants? He emphasized upon two important lessons; first one was an intellectual one, i.e., always prefer the fact over belief; no matter what you wish to see or believe. And the second lesson he loved to share was a moral one, i.e., love is wise and hatred is foolish; tolerate others whether you like or dislike the habits or thoughts of others. A man who witnessed two horrific world wars and the holocaust wouldn't have suggested anything better than these wise lessons. 

Our believes, as it is evident most of the time, lead us to a zone of dogma, from there, no scope for the return of sense remains feasible. Fact, though its obscurity is a burden which must be unfolded with a scientific attitude, represents the truth. And nothing, even a profound wish, replaces the truth. Second, tolerance is not a utopian wish. It happens in our daily life when we don't like certain things about certain persons. But we adapt to those critical situations, and let them realize what is good for them without morally sermoning them. Differences are a matter of celebration. It really exhibit the way nature with its pen draws every unique painting with joy and serenity. Beauty lies in uniqueness not in similarity and repetition. I often find a song which is over-enjoyed for some moments becomes a boring routine in its repetition. Life challenges us with its dynamism. There are a very few who are able to love the change and remain committed to think, and contemplate about what is happening around us. It's always an easy way to remain obedient or slave of his own habbits and thoughts, but to challenge it, is nothing less than an affirmation of life!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...

Sterile Preoccupation: Towards Technocracy and Loss of Human

William Blake, Newton (1795 ) Roland Barthes reminds us, looks us back from his grave, and constantly warns us about the mythological character of human life, our society, and the relationship of human with the life-systems, whereas symbolic profusions outweigh rational contemplation, emotive appeals are strategically manoeuvred for the deceptive promises and considerations, rhetorical narratives are deployed to symbolize the virtue of unbounded eloquences, significances, and exemplifying extravagances of meanings, ritualistic and mechanical productions of narratives, and seductions towards efficacy as instrumentalised worldview have relegated human relationships to the status of mechanization and technocratizations. What is so significant about the mechanisation of thinking and ritualistic institutionalisation? If not the loss of humanistic elements in the human relationships and the relationships of human species from their nature, ecosystem, and the life-systems itself. What is so p...