Skip to main content

In Defence of Moral Laws


Geetam Tiwari, IIT Professor, wrote an erudite piece for The Hindu quite a few days ago on the recent amendment of The Motor Vehicle Act. That essay has made me aware that the structural problems are far more important than a top-dressing attitude. The modern science of law revolves around a few penal justifications, and deterrence, as a penal justification, is one of few ones, which is taken as a show-piece, to justify much higher punishment. As if, writing down on the paper becomes a socio-historical reality. The positivistic science of law doesn't allow us to diagnose the real problems. It remains expositorial in its contours, to refer a Benthamite term, or fictious like a "persona ficta". Hegel was realistically true when he remarked, "Once you start knowing someone you stop understanding him". Understanding is an "organic attitude", which requires openness in perspective, and courage to look beyond 'dogmatic castle'. 

There may be so many factors, which compel a person to be a violator of law. But to draw a conclusion with the help of a few infected, incoherent, and insufficient data, is a problematic attitude towards the problem. Every solution, in fact, starts to leap on, once a problem is unearthed. For scientific attitude and scientism are two different world-views. Scientific attitude, on one hand, is liberating in its orientation and its effects, however, scientism itself is a dogma, in a sense that, it doesn't allow any other normativity to grow up. After all, science in itself is a cultural artefact. It cannot be an end itself. It is an instrument for certain other ends. Science is not merely a technology, it is an attitude.

If I go with the simple example of class-room experience, what factors contribute in low level of attendance in class rooms generally? Whether it shows inability of the teachers or disinterested zeal of the students? Whether technicality and complexity of the subject, or dysfunctional communication and cultural factors, which are instrumental in this general phenomenon? There cannot be one simple answer. In fact, there are many ones. And, of course, only the mandate of the attendance in the name of deterrence may compel some or all, to come inside the class room, but virtually, no real presence could be ensured through mandatory attendance. 

The top-dressing approach of the positivistic science must be re-visited, in order to sensitize about the structural diagnosis, and to ensure structural changes, which may be viable for all. Only fear or reward factor, again Benthamite approach towards the punishment, can bring only a little obedience in law. There ought to be some categorical factor, some inner motivation, to drive near the goal. The parables of Angulimaal as a robber, and Maharshi Valmiki, those remarkable stories of makeovers, from a robber to a saint in Indian mythology, reflect upon the real aspects of Categorical moral reasoning, which was the hallmark of Kantian moral paradigm. Change is real, to my mind, when it comes from within. And a change out of compulsion, seems to be an end product of "official love" (Gayatri Spivak).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet...
1 comment
Read more

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Violence of Law and Ethics of Care

The worldliness of world is constituted by care (Martin Heidegger). Only in our concernfull dealing with the things around, the existence of being may be understood. In our everydayness of care and concern the world appears to our consciousness. Care is the language, a nomos of our existence, yet it is hardly perceptible in a world of law, which was rightly defined by Hans Kelsen and Max Weber as “legitimate use of violence”. The monopoly of political state over the violent nature of law makes it the most elevated institutions in relation to various social orders co-existing with the political state. Politics, once conceived as “an art of possibilities” by Harold Laski, is now becoming merely a language of allegations, counter-allegations, trickery and manipulation, in one statement, it symbolizes the archetypical character of violence whose expression is apparent in the existence of law. Violence has become our mode of existence in a sense that it speaks through us when the humanity f...
Post a Comment
Read more