Skip to main content

Two Cultures

The Ancient of Days: William Blake (1794)

When Max Weber wrote the Protestant Ethics and Spirit of Capitalism, it was a master creation in the field of sociology. His impressive method of explanation through long foot-noting and love for society, culture and economic pattern of production and change made him an exemplary scholar of social sciences. His study towards religious organizations was inclined to unearth the deeper psychology behind the "disenchantment of the world" (Max Weber, Science as Vocation 159-204). In the period of renaissance, cities like Florence evolved as a hub for the  business and exchange; the exchange took place not simply at the level of material goods, rather ideas also travelled with the high speed from one landscape to another. It was the period of Protestant movement, which challenged the Catholic doctrine of other worldly leisures and pleasures. The Protestant movement had its own protagonists like Thomas Aquinas, Luther, Calvin, and a new jurisprudence of "calling" emerged at the sight of history. American way of life is a deeply religious life, in that sense, which is poetic and lyrical as far as embracing the utilitarian ethics in toto. This conjectural portrayal could be understood in context of Benjamin Franklin's writings, when he says, "The good paymaster is lord of another man’s purse" (Franklin, Advice to a Young Tradesman). This new religious doctrine had a role in divorcing the other worldliness from the religious beliefs. Even Bible was quoted in the  justification of this practical religion of calling. As per Bible, "Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings” (Max Weber, Protestant Ethics, Routledge edition, p.19). This practical-religious doctrine in the name of calling, redefined the very character of society. In that sense, Max Weber was an angel writer of sociology, who discovered a deep rooted relationship between the Protestant ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism for his anticipated an American way of life. In his words, "The earning of money within the modern economic order is, so long as it is done legally, the result and the expression of virtue and proficiency in a calling; and this virtue and proficiency are, as it is now not difficult to see, the real Alpha and Omega of Franklin’s ethic" (Weber, Protestant Ethics, Routledge, 2001, p. 19).

He found a rationalized system of labour, land, and production as the new spirit of capitalism, which was absent from the ancient traditional societies, tribal communities, or in Graco-Roman cultures. That absence is visible in Aristocratic society whereas the ownership of land was the leitmotif of that period, anything like an organized pattern of market was absent.

The diverse writings of Max Weber were an extension to the first culture, culminated from a romantic tradition in pre-christianity, known as Gnosticism and Neo-Platonism, which found a bond of love for nature, spirituality, tradition, clan or society, etc.

The Second culture is what we know today as Enlightenment values, conceptualized in the writings of Immanuel Kant, Condorcet, Humboldt, Bentham, J. S. Mill, Adam Smith, etc. This tradition is prevalent today across the world, whereas rationality, reason, and progress are considered as the inherent necessities. Humanism is its chief belief. This tradition has cultivated liberty, autonomy, equality, utility, as the desirable values. The second culture has conceived nature in material sense, devoid of value property, which could be quantified and commercialized; from mining the minerals to polluting the rivers; plethora of hazardous wastes are produced in the name of production. Liberalism has been emancipatory in many ways, particularly, it has democratized the voices of subaltern, but its limitations are also apparent; materialism cannot produce the meaning for life. Materials are means only, end is always beyond the basic needs. Liberty is an uncompromising value, but meaningful in the companionship of equality. Unfortunately both the values were introduced in Western hemisphere, and kept in a dialectical tension to each-other (Akeel Bilgrami, Secularism, Identity, and Disenchantment, Harvard University Press, 2014, p. 125).This tension has stripped liberty into irresponsible licence to plunder the nature and has transformed it into natural resources; this tension has impoverishes the sense of equality, which has remained a paradigm of "few are more equal than others" (George Orwell, Animal farm). Thomas Piketty has portrayed this relationship with an interesting equation, i.e. R is greater than G, whereas R stands for the rate of return from capital and G stands for the rate of growth (Thomas Piketty, Capital in Twenty-First Century, Belknap Press, 2014, p. 355). Perhaps, Second culture has to learn from the first one for a balanced "un-alienieted life" (Akeel Bilgrami, Secularism, Identity, and Disenchantment, Harvard University Press, 2014, p. 129), whereas social and individual tyrannies are kept in abeyance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet

Same Sex Marriage Verdict: Apolitical Politics of Court

Every judgment of the Constitutional court solves and unsolves certain fundamental questions. Court often takes two steps forward and one step backward (Shklar). Navtej Johar was rightly celebrated as a progressive judgment which recognised same sex relationships on the touchstone of constitutional morality. In a way, judgment progressively explored the colonial and post-colonial politics and reviewed Section 377, IPC from the perspective of constitutional morality emanating from the "objective purposive interpretation",  a concept devised by Justice Aharon Barack, a former judge of Israel Supreme Court. NALSA judgment already went ahead with the recommendations to broaden the scope of reservation policy in India to allow the constitutional protection of sexual minorities. The latest judgment has attracted widespread criticism from the intellectuals. Many of them have argued that the Court has not taken its responsibility in protecting the rights of sexual minorities. There i

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the