Skip to main content

Changing and Changeless Reality



Upanishads contemplated about changeless and changing reality. One was designated as the supreme self and other as Maya (illusion). One was conceptualized as the seer and other as seen. The dichotomy of subject and object is as old as Greek civilization. This division was also conceptualized by Nyaya and Navya Nyaya philosophy in ancient India. The modern materialistic science emerged out of this dichotomy and objectified the worldly reality. In that process, subject was also objectified as property. Ancient Indian philosophy raised this logical question: if something changes then how does it exist? It is similar to what Zeno exemplified through his paradoxes. Zeno raised the question if an arrow in moving in time how does it exist as ontological reality? Its reality is relative to time and space. Nagarjuna, a Buddhist philosopher, questioned the very essence of everything. He was was considered as the hard core skeptic whose only job was to demolish the arguments of opponents without raising an argument of his own. Nagarjuna through his prasanga raised the question if something is changing then how come it exists? All the changing reality is just like a hide and seek game of appearance and disappearance, which comes out of avidya (ignorance). True Jnana is to discriminate between changing and changeless reality. Gaudapada raised a very important argument: Something which is changing has no reality of its own and changeless is the only reality which does not get affected in sway of time. Just like Plato imagined a world of conventional reality, which is corrupting and decaying, but the absolute form is otherworldly, eternal, and incorruptible. Upanishads imagined the changeless reality, which alone remains a seer, an experiencer, an observer, the consciousness, which doesn't exist in time and space. Physical body, emotions, feelings, intellect, and unconscious awareness are temporal reality. It is also affected and created by space. Beyond the physical and mental substratum, the pure awareness remains as the ultimate reality of the Universe, that reality is beyond the imagination of physics. That metaphysical domain is experienced by mystics and poets, whose reason and passion of logic cools down and there only insight pervades into the light which is changeless and eternal. That source is quite apparent yet the baffling mind is too skeptical to experience the changeless in a changing world of reality. Buddha categorized it as the conventional truth and universal truth. Both are as true as the shining light of Sun. While one is perceivable and other is identifiable as suggested by Aurobindo in his Life Divine.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet
1 comment
Read more

Same Sex Marriage Verdict: Apolitical Politics of Court

Every judgment of the Constitutional court solves and unsolves certain fundamental questions. Court often takes two steps forward and one step backward (Shklar). Navtej Johar was rightly celebrated as a progressive judgment which recognised same sex relationships on the touchstone of constitutional morality. In a way, judgment progressively explored the colonial and post-colonial politics and reviewed Section 377, IPC from the perspective of constitutional morality emanating from the "objective purposive interpretation",  a concept devised by Justice Aharon Barack, a former judge of Israel Supreme Court. NALSA judgment already went ahead with the recommendations to broaden the scope of reservation policy in India to allow the constitutional protection of sexual minorities. The latest judgment has attracted widespread criticism from the intellectuals. Many of them have argued that the Court has not taken its responsibility in protecting the rights of sexual minorities. There i
Post a Comment
Read more

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the
Post a Comment
Read more