Skip to main content

SECULARISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS

"Secularism is not the binary opposite of communalism. The opposite of communalism is religious harmony. Secularism is the diametric opposite of theocracy or the merging of two awesome forms of power — the non-religious and the religious. Theocracy simply does not fit into modern democratic imaginations", writes Neera Chandoke. 

L. Fuller while developing the inner morality of law, drifted a bit from external morality of law, while drawing a picture of "inner contents" of law. Secularism is quite similar to the idea that the contents of secularism are not drawn from theology, rather from its absence. It is external morality, which asks for "state neutrality" in the matter of religious believes. It's a thinner concept unlike a thicker one, which has no task to rationalize theology, but to leave it alone for the conscience of the citizens. Secularism is a spinal code of democracy, which couldn't be reduced to majoritarian ethics, it must pass the test of "overlapping consensus" (Rawls,  Political Liberalism), to draw plurality, uniqueness, and a common realm of identity in nature of citizenship. Secularism was earned after the mad dance of sentiments bewitched European souls. And to enrich it they chose to constitutionize it. It doesn't mean that the value of tolerance is an European ideal. It was deeply rooted in the civilization of China, India, Africa, and many other places. The practice of tolerance was a practical necessity for the society and its survival. Accepting the difference and co-learning are not what we know ae "Westphalian ideal". It was simply re-invented through Westphalian Treaty, and was attached to the notion of ethnic nationalism. Indian nationalism was cultivated and established out of situational necessity and colonial experiences, for the politics of hatred created chasm within the minds and souls of Indian cultures in British colonial era. Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, didn't invent any new thing, but their firm commitments to the ideals for co-existence made them the founder of modern India. Whose future lies in spirit of tolerance, acceptance of difference, and harmony. 

Every view of life which chooses to cross the rubicon of selfhood is a life of enriched values, to think and to act beyond self is a courageous task, and to accept what is stranger to oneself is the value which makes a democracy possible. To denounce every bit of differences is a reflection of cynical attitude towards learning and co-learning. The best practice is nowhere, but to become better is our goal as a rich civilization. For secularism is our first nature, and we would remain committed for it, because the India of India is its plurality, its uniqueness, and semblance of unity and diversity. I appreciate Prof. Chandoke for writing such a wonderful piece, for no other time is more perfect than ours.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human's Rationality: Its Unfree-Freedoms

Cosmic energy is moving into various forms and patterns, its quest is to become, what Arthur Schopenhauer called 'will to live'.  (Arthur Schopenhauer, 1818). He is explicit that: “Thus the will to live everywhere preys upon itself, and in different forms is its own nourishment, till finally the human race, because it subdues all the others, regards nature as a manufactory for its own use. Yet even the human race...reveals in itself with most terrible distinctness this conflict, this variance of the will with itself…”. Every ‘will to become' is a movement, encompassing the history of past and future; the degree of rationality and its gradation are normativized by thoughts as hierarchy of souls and monads. Human being as likeness and image of God possess the highest truth, indeed! In fact, human being is the only species who possess and owns the truth, it is the only mode of being who puts truth at stake, constructs its horizons and claim of legitimacy and illegitimacy, defi...

The Reciprocal Grounding of Freedom and Moral Law in Kant's Critique of Practical Reason

I Introduction: The Problem of Transcendental Freedom In Immanuel Kant's practical philosophy, transcendental freedom and the moral law are established not as independent concepts but as reciprocally determinant principles. This blog examines the central thesis of the Critique of Practical Reason, which posits that the moral law serves as the ratio cognoscendi (the reason for knowing) of freedom, while freedom is the ratio essendi (the reason for being) of the moral law. We become aware of our freedom only because we are first conscious of the moral law as an unconditional command; the "ought" reveals the "can." Conversely, the moral law itself could not exist as a binding principle were freedom not a real property of the will. Through a critical analysis of Kant’s text, this paper traces his argument from the rejection of all empirical moral theories to the establishment of a purely formal law, known as a "fact of reason." This analysis reveals how Ka...

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...