Skip to main content

SECULARISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS

"Secularism is not the binary opposite of communalism. The opposite of communalism is religious harmony. Secularism is the diametric opposite of theocracy or the merging of two awesome forms of power — the non-religious and the religious. Theocracy simply does not fit into modern democratic imaginations", writes Neera Chandoke. 

L. Fuller while developing the inner morality of law, drifted a bit from external morality of law, while drawing a picture of "inner contents" of law. Secularism is quite similar to the idea that the contents of secularism are not drawn from theology, rather from its absence. It is external morality, which asks for "state neutrality" in the matter of religious believes. It's a thinner concept unlike a thicker one, which has no task to rationalize theology, but to leave it alone for the conscience of the citizens. Secularism is a spinal code of democracy, which couldn't be reduced to majoritarian ethics, it must pass the test of "overlapping consensus" (Rawls,  Political Liberalism), to draw plurality, uniqueness, and a common realm of identity in nature of citizenship. Secularism was earned after the mad dance of sentiments bewitched European souls. And to enrich it they chose to constitutionize it. It doesn't mean that the value of tolerance is an European ideal. It was deeply rooted in the civilization of China, India, Africa, and many other places. The practice of tolerance was a practical necessity for the society and its survival. Accepting the difference and co-learning are not what we know ae "Westphalian ideal". It was simply re-invented through Westphalian Treaty, and was attached to the notion of ethnic nationalism. Indian nationalism was cultivated and established out of situational necessity and colonial experiences, for the politics of hatred created chasm within the minds and souls of Indian cultures in British colonial era. Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, didn't invent any new thing, but their firm commitments to the ideals for co-existence made them the founder of modern India. Whose future lies in spirit of tolerance, acceptance of difference, and harmony. 

Every view of life which chooses to cross the rubicon of selfhood is a life of enriched values, to think and to act beyond self is a courageous task, and to accept what is stranger to oneself is the value which makes a democracy possible. To denounce every bit of differences is a reflection of cynical attitude towards learning and co-learning. The best practice is nowhere, but to become better is our goal as a rich civilization. For secularism is our first nature, and we would remain committed for it, because the India of India is its plurality, its uniqueness, and semblance of unity and diversity. I appreciate Prof. Chandoke for writing such a wonderful piece, for no other time is more perfect than ours.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Imagination

Student: I want to excel in my life. Over the years, my graph of success is achieving a new height. I am doing hard work to become one of the smartest and richest persons on the Earth. Teacher: Wonderful! Who is  achiever and what is achieved? Student: I am the achiever. My name and fame are shining day by day.  Teacher: Who is this ‘I’? What is the material by which it is produced? Student: I is the ego which is the agent achieving successes and facing failures. Teacher: Whether ego is real or imaginary? Student: It is made of name, form, and function. Teacher: Whether name, form, and function are eternal?  Student: No, they are changing. Teacher: Anything changes does it exist? Whether these are real or merely fictitious images appearing and disappearing before the sightscreen of mind? Student: They are the images constructing my identity as a person. Teacher: Well said! What is the stuff by which these images are made of? Who is maker and what is made? Student: They ar...
Post a Comment
Read more

पिरोता जाऊँ एक माला ज़िन्दगी का

पढ़ता हूँ हर एक दिन एक ही पन्ना, हर दिन हज़ार ये मालूम पड़ते हैं। जबसे होश संभाला है एक ही पन्ना सवांरते आया हूँ, लोग इसे ज़िन्दगी कहते हैं। इसपे लिखे हर एक लब्ज़ जो मेरे मालूम पड़ते हैं, ना जाने कितने जुबां पे चढ़े होंगे। आज हम भी कुछ पल के लिए ही सही इसके सारथी हैं, जाने से पहले कुछ रंग मेरा भी इसपे चढ़ जाए, बस इसीलिए एक ही पन्ना बार बार पलटता रहता हूँ। हर कोई अनजाने किताब की तलाश में बाहर निकलता है, जिसका हर एक पन्ना वो ख़ुद है। जब ख़ुद के रंग को समझ ही ना पाया, तो भला इंद्रधनुषी किताब के क्या मायने हैं? अस्तित्व में ना जाने कितने पन्ने बिखरे पड़े हैं, बस एक से ही अवगत हो जाऊँ, उसके हर एक शब्द को चुनता जाऊँ, कुछ पल के लिये सही, पिरोता जाऊँ एक माला ज़िन्दगी का।
1 comment
Read more

Human's Rationality: Its Unfree-Freedoms

Cosmic energy is moving into various forms and patterns, its quest is to become, what Arthur Schopenhauer called 'will to live'.  (Arthur Schopenhauer, 1818). He is explicit that: “Thus the will to live everywhere preys upon itself, and in different forms is its own nourishment, till finally the human race, because it subdues all the others, regards nature as a manufactory for its own use. Yet even the human race...reveals in itself with most terrible distinctness this conflict, this variance of the will with itself…”. Every ‘will to become' is a movement, encompassing the history of past and future; the degree of rationality and its gradation are normativized by thoughts as hierarchy of souls and monads. Human being as likeness and image of God possess the highest truth, indeed! In fact, human being is the only species who possess and owns the truth, it is the only mode of being who puts truth at stake, constructs its horizons and claim of legitimacy and illegitimacy, defi...
Post a Comment
Read more