Skip to main content

SECULARISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS

"Secularism is not the binary opposite of communalism. The opposite of communalism is religious harmony. Secularism is the diametric opposite of theocracy or the merging of two awesome forms of power — the non-religious and the religious. Theocracy simply does not fit into modern democratic imaginations", writes Neera Chandoke. 

L. Fuller while developing the inner morality of law, drifted a bit from external morality of law, while drawing a picture of "inner contents" of law. Secularism is quite similar to the idea that the contents of secularism are not drawn from theology, rather from its absence. It is external morality, which asks for "state neutrality" in the matter of religious believes. It's a thinner concept unlike a thicker one, which has no task to rationalize theology, but to leave it alone for the conscience of the citizens. Secularism is a spinal code of democracy, which couldn't be reduced to majoritarian ethics, it must pass the test of "overlapping consensus" (Rawls,  Political Liberalism), to draw plurality, uniqueness, and a common realm of identity in nature of citizenship. Secularism was earned after the mad dance of sentiments bewitched European souls. And to enrich it they chose to constitutionize it. It doesn't mean that the value of tolerance is an European ideal. It was deeply rooted in the civilization of China, India, Africa, and many other places. The practice of tolerance was a practical necessity for the society and its survival. Accepting the difference and co-learning are not what we know ae "Westphalian ideal". It was simply re-invented through Westphalian Treaty, and was attached to the notion of ethnic nationalism. Indian nationalism was cultivated and established out of situational necessity and colonial experiences, for the politics of hatred created chasm within the minds and souls of Indian cultures in British colonial era. Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, didn't invent any new thing, but their firm commitments to the ideals for co-existence made them the founder of modern India. Whose future lies in spirit of tolerance, acceptance of difference, and harmony. 

Every view of life which chooses to cross the rubicon of selfhood is a life of enriched values, to think and to act beyond self is a courageous task, and to accept what is stranger to oneself is the value which makes a democracy possible. To denounce every bit of differences is a reflection of cynical attitude towards learning and co-learning. The best practice is nowhere, but to become better is our goal as a rich civilization. For secularism is our first nature, and we would remain committed for it, because the India of India is its plurality, its uniqueness, and semblance of unity and diversity. I appreciate Prof. Chandoke for writing such a wonderful piece, for no other time is more perfect than ours.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet...
1 comment
Read more

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Violence of Law and Ethics of Care

The worldliness of world is constituted by care (Martin Heidegger). Only in our concernfull dealing with the things around, the existence of being may be understood. In our everydayness of care and concern the world appears to our consciousness. Care is the language, a nomos of our existence, yet it is hardly perceptible in a world of law, which was rightly defined by Hans Kelsen and Max Weber as “legitimate use of violence”. The monopoly of political state over the violent nature of law makes it the most elevated institutions in relation to various social orders co-existing with the political state. Politics, once conceived as “an art of possibilities” by Harold Laski, is now becoming merely a language of allegations, counter-allegations, trickery and manipulation, in one statement, it symbolizes the archetypical character of violence whose expression is apparent in the existence of law. Violence has become our mode of existence in a sense that it speaks through us when the humanity f...
Post a Comment
Read more