Skip to main content

SCIENTIFIC REALISM OF HILARY PUTNAM


Philosophy is often regarded as area of study which is redundant in the era of extreme commercial commitment, to earn profit at the cost of all the wasteful externalities. This is how the modern man creates artificial artefacts for leisure oriented commitment towards self and exploitative business with others. For science has effectively become a company in order to enhance technological efficacy for widespread consumerism. One simple example could be experienced accross Universities around the globe when classical or critical philosophy is disappearing from cariculum, because philosophy in its wider effects, is able to produce thinking mind, which is pernicious for the masters of mankind who are leading the cultural industries to produce consumer minds; for humanology is reaching to its death bed. 

Philosophy of science has two different streams; on the one hand, Aristotelean logic which rejects the idea of mind as a ghost in the machine. Rather, it starts with  teleogical logic. In that sense, the mirroring philosophy of knowledge is predicted with accuracy. Descartes' mind and body dualism offers rationalistic account of knowledge. Which means a mind has capacity to grasp the entire external existence, which exists independently. An empiricist, for example Aristotle, or a rationalist like Descartes is rejected by Kantian metaphysical realism, which accepts each school of thought as a half truth. The copernican revolution follows the third Buddha's medium, or Aristotelean golden mean; Kant becomes the liberator of epistemology; accepting metaphysical world in its completeness at the same time epystemogical enrichness is expounded through interpretative intuitionism. Kant in its total orientation became one of the leading philosopher of science, later on, Newton, Einstein, Darwin, to name a few, revolutionised humanology with path-breaking scientific ideas. 

One of the critics of science is its mythical nature, which works in sequence of 'conjectures and refutations', to refer the notable work of Karl Popper. Anti-positivist thinkers reject science as scientism, for example, Thomas Kunn, condemns it for its incompleteness. For science cannot tell us why our life is at the first place? It cannot understand the value judgment. Value rationality is outside the domain of science. Science as a method has never been constant, rather each paradigm of science remains for certain period, then a new Paradigm makes it redundant. For example, quantum physics could not be understood with the scientific lense used by Newton or Einstein. 

Hilary Putnam puts forward an optimistic account about science, which appears to be a mix of metaphysical and epystemogical streams. Science may not discover the theory of everything with perfection, however, it is one and only way to pursue it. For no other method has credibly provided alternative of science. Human's interpretation is undeniable in perceiving every scientific phenomenon, even mathematical numbers. But, it does not kill a human mind to pursue the quest of knowledge with keenness and enthusiasm.

Modern day scientific research is inclined towards computer science which works on boolean logic, which can compute any complex numbers, can process and conserve data, in a way, produces all the desirable ends through programmed softwares. Hardware has almost negligible role to play in its functionality. However, every human mind has a relationship with its bodily structures to refer William James. Humans are not simply considered to a machine, which can be replicated in/through computer; until now no scientific formula can successfully reduce human agency in computational logic. Human is more than machine, more than an static object. This is how the scientific realism of Putnam compels us to revisit all the prejudices for science, especially for those fellows, who are reducing even emotional intelligence in boolean logic. For value is not a number which may be decoded. Humans are now much interested in commercial and exploitative ethics. The 'Disenchantment of the World', to borrow the phrase of great Max Weber, has already 'alinieted' human agency. Much efforts are needed to emancipate science from its methodological slumber.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet...
1 comment
Read more

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Violence of Law and Ethics of Care

The worldliness of world is constituted by care (Martin Heidegger). Only in our concernfull dealing with the things around, the existence of being may be understood. In our everydayness of care and concern the world appears to our consciousness. Care is the language, a nomos of our existence, yet it is hardly perceptible in a world of law, which was rightly defined by Hans Kelsen and Max Weber as “legitimate use of violence”. The monopoly of political state over the violent nature of law makes it the most elevated institutions in relation to various social orders co-existing with the political state. Politics, once conceived as “an art of possibilities” by Harold Laski, is now becoming merely a language of allegations, counter-allegations, trickery and manipulation, in one statement, it symbolizes the archetypical character of violence whose expression is apparent in the existence of law. Violence has become our mode of existence in a sense that it speaks through us when the humanity f...
Post a Comment
Read more