Skip to main content

SCIENTIFIC REALISM OF HILARY PUTNAM


Philosophy is often regarded as area of study which is redundant in the era of extreme commercial commitment, to earn profit at the cost of all the wasteful externalities. This is how the modern man creates artificial artefacts for leisure oriented commitment towards self and exploitative business with others. For science has effectively become a company in order to enhance technological efficacy for widespread consumerism. One simple example could be experienced accross Universities around the globe when classical or critical philosophy is disappearing from cariculum, because philosophy in its wider effects, is able to produce thinking mind, which is pernicious for the masters of mankind who are leading the cultural industries to produce consumer minds; for humanology is reaching to its death bed. 

Philosophy of science has two different streams; on the one hand, Aristotelean logic which rejects the idea of mind as a ghost in the machine. Rather, it starts with  teleogical logic. In that sense, the mirroring philosophy of knowledge is predicted with accuracy. Descartes' mind and body dualism offers rationalistic account of knowledge. Which means a mind has capacity to grasp the entire external existence, which exists independently. An empiricist, for example Aristotle, or a rationalist like Descartes is rejected by Kantian metaphysical realism, which accepts each school of thought as a half truth. The copernican revolution follows the third Buddha's medium, or Aristotelean golden mean; Kant becomes the liberator of epistemology; accepting metaphysical world in its completeness at the same time epystemogical enrichness is expounded through interpretative intuitionism. Kant in its total orientation became one of the leading philosopher of science, later on, Newton, Einstein, Darwin, to name a few, revolutionised humanology with path-breaking scientific ideas. 

One of the critics of science is its mythical nature, which works in sequence of 'conjectures and refutations', to refer the notable work of Karl Popper. Anti-positivist thinkers reject science as scientism, for example, Thomas Kunn, condemns it for its incompleteness. For science cannot tell us why our life is at the first place? It cannot understand the value judgment. Value rationality is outside the domain of science. Science as a method has never been constant, rather each paradigm of science remains for certain period, then a new Paradigm makes it redundant. For example, quantum physics could not be understood with the scientific lense used by Newton or Einstein. 

Hilary Putnam puts forward an optimistic account about science, which appears to be a mix of metaphysical and epystemogical streams. Science may not discover the theory of everything with perfection, however, it is one and only way to pursue it. For no other method has credibly provided alternative of science. Human's interpretation is undeniable in perceiving every scientific phenomenon, even mathematical numbers. But, it does not kill a human mind to pursue the quest of knowledge with keenness and enthusiasm.

Modern day scientific research is inclined towards computer science which works on boolean logic, which can compute any complex numbers, can process and conserve data, in a way, produces all the desirable ends through programmed softwares. Hardware has almost negligible role to play in its functionality. However, every human mind has a relationship with its bodily structures to refer William James. Humans are not simply considered to a machine, which can be replicated in/through computer; until now no scientific formula can successfully reduce human agency in computational logic. Human is more than machine, more than an static object. This is how the scientific realism of Putnam compels us to revisit all the prejudices for science, especially for those fellows, who are reducing even emotional intelligence in boolean logic. For value is not a number which may be decoded. Humans are now much interested in commercial and exploitative ethics. The 'Disenchantment of the World', to borrow the phrase of great Max Weber, has already 'alinieted' human agency. Much efforts are needed to emancipate science from its methodological slumber.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human's Rationality: Its Unfree-Freedoms

Cosmic energy is moving into various forms and patterns, its quest is to become, what Arthur Schopenhauer called 'will to live'.  (Arthur Schopenhauer, 1818). He is explicit that: “Thus the will to live everywhere preys upon itself, and in different forms is its own nourishment, till finally the human race, because it subdues all the others, regards nature as a manufactory for its own use. Yet even the human race...reveals in itself with most terrible distinctness this conflict, this variance of the will with itself…”. Every ‘will to become' is a movement, encompassing the history of past and future; the degree of rationality and its gradation are normativized by thoughts as hierarchy of souls and monads. Human being as likeness and image of God possess the highest truth, indeed! In fact, human being is the only species who possess and owns the truth, it is the only mode of being who puts truth at stake, constructs its horizons and claim of legitimacy and illegitimacy, defi...

Imagination

Student: I want to excel in my life. Over the years, my graph of success is achieving a new height. I am doing hard work to become one of the smartest and richest persons on the Earth. Teacher: Wonderful! Who is  achiever and what is achieved? Student: I am the achiever. My name and fame are shining day by day.  Teacher: Who is this ‘I’? What is the material by which it is produced? Student: I is the ego which is the agent achieving successes and facing failures. Teacher: Whether ego is real or imaginary? Student: It is made of name, form, and function. Teacher: Whether name, form, and function are eternal?  Student: No, they are changing. Teacher: Anything changes does it exist? Whether these are real or merely fictitious images appearing and disappearing before the sightscreen of mind? Student: They are the images constructing my identity as a person. Teacher: Well said! What is the stuff by which these images are made of? Who is maker and what is made? Student: They ar...

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...