Skip to main content

VINDICATION AGAINST PRIVATE PRISON SYSTEM

Prison systems throughout the world are meant to ensure surveillance and control, nevertheless a humane face, for example, 'corrective justice' has been rhetorically used as a poster claim by the reformers of our age. The disciplinary power appears to be subtle and effective, penetrates human mind in a way a subject becomes the victim  and predator of its own penetrative gaze. The syndrome of 'being observed'  remains forever for no brute force appears to be too brutal to transform a subject as a disciplinary master of self. 

Prisons across the world are overflown with the vulnerable people for they are the victim of their miserable living conditions. Most of the crimes are branded with a class character, for poor appear to be the most easiest target for authorities concerned who are responsible for the maintenance and sustainance of law and order. Prison reforms since Colonial times have been designed to help in the implementation of surveillance, for no other line of argument than Orwellian metaphor justifies with this  exclamatory statement: "Big Brother is Watching You" (George Orwell, 1984). Jeremy Bentham, the reformer, who had the first claim over the title, the father of English Jurisprudence, came out with proposal of prison reform; an architecture of panopticon was proposed by him to help the concerned authorities in making of  'docile' subject (Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish).  

The biggest strength of any criminal legal system rests with its capacity to create the frenzy and fearsome environment for the violators. The fear of crime divides people, in a way  'Jurisprudence of fear' functions like "Derridean arche-type" (Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology), writes and rewrites the psche of criminal Jurisprudence, fashionably known in academia, as  criminolgy and penology. It is undeniable fact that the majority of prisoners are impoverished under trial prisoners in India, U.S., or Russia for that matter. Their socio-economic mileue reflects on an urgent and inevitable story to tell; a legal system is unimaginable under ethical school of thought, unless market principle decides the rule of the game. For lawyers are entitled to charge fee as much as they are willing to raise the bar. Has there been concern for the Gandhian "last human" (here I'm slightly twisting the Gandhian terminology to make it more gender sensitive term; though human as a term remains coloured with male experience) the focus would have sifted towards the stakeholders of justice. But the most of illiterate poor folks seem to be "included to be excluded" like Kafka's parable in The Trial, depicts a story 'sub-alterisation' of voiceless and spaceless (Georgio Agamben, Homo Sacer).

The privatization of prison system has been hazardous in the U.S. over the years. Any such attempt in India will yield some unforseen harmful effects for the "Wretched of the Earth" (Frantz Fanon, Wretched of the Earth). Any such conversion of dignified human life into "bare life" (Hannah Arendt, The Totalitarian State) at the benefit of 'profit spirit' would be detrimental to the 'right of being human' jurisprudencial approach. Once the Private Prison is allowed to enter into the frame, the sole aim would be to facilitate a better surveillance mechanism with the help of panopticon like architecture, particularly the modern day technology, cyborgs, could be effectively used to control human psche with ease and efficacy. Any such move would only be able to fecilitate and justify my hypothesis that it is capability which  helps in determining the fate of any subject under any given legal system. Business ethics has some inherent limits to buy and sell. Justice must be above any sorts of insinuation and prejudice. Once faith crumbles what remains there to protect human destiny?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...

The Glory of Belief Industry

Disappearance of questions is the pre-condition of artificial certainty. Therefore, it is profitable investment to establish and sustain the belief industry. This industry produces the efficient Man whose substratum is not the divine soul or mental faculty but a non-thinking mind which militantly conform the group solidarity of the masses. When answers are easily available and generated by the Artificial Intelligence, who will take the pain for thinking and unthinking or deliberating to develop logical capacity or for establishing the paradigm of truth? As Ashis Nandy explains the creative process which requires to meditate with the questions and to remain with the questions for a longer period of time to create and unveil the mask of deception. The artistry in epistemic creativity necessitates the patience caring of the questions. The cultivation and exploration of questions and mitigated skepticism to unravel what is said and unsaid, the expressions and silences. Even so called Dark ...