Skip to main content

In Praise of Vision: Jeremy Bentham and Utilitarianism

Sometimes a good book makes you happier more than a million dreams of heavenly pleasures one may dream about. But reading is a difficult habit which seldom interests you and once you find the music in books no other imagined pleasure would seem to be perpetual enough to replace the bliss of reading. I learnt from a textual journey of Jacques Derrida, to whom I admire immensely for his sheer brilliance, which I perceive in his magnum opus, Of Grammatology. Derrida taught me how not to read a text; reading with love and reading with suscipicion travel around through two extreme poles. It is only after a reading with the critical intimacy a text becomes a leader to guide in a dark and unguided path to explore. 

Today, I got to know about Jeremy Bentham a little bit, because narratives and headnote knowledge are more obnoxious than ignorance, though frankly admitting, I am still away from his masterpiece, Principles of Morals and Legislation. While reading Karl Polanayi, The Great Transformation, I felt a deep-rooted connection with Jeremy Bentham. What is the most unbelievable part of his journey is to know about a person who left the influence for today's world which can never be erased from our behaviours and memory. As a master of utilitarianism he appears to me more than a political philosopher, or a social reformer. Utilitarianism was a vision of seeing the world with a fresh and unique perspective. Bentham was more than an economist, philosopher, and jurist. He was a man of the century, and his ideas are practiced everywhere since his life time to our age. We are not aware about them that from where really it did come from. He had a pervasive sense of disgust with natural law and natural rights philosophies. He once remarked, "natural law is a nonsense talk". He was also not a fan of egalitarianism, which the Marxist critiques adopted and invented with the zeal and conviction,   rather he was in love with laissez faire state. As an empiricist he liked sciences and social sciences more than metaphysics, particularly he was influenced with the associational psychology. Pleasure and pain principle was associated with the idea that every human being wants to maximize pleasures at the cost of minimizing pains. And the sole driving force of the human's action is reward and punishment. In a way, Bentham was a pragmatist who did all the reforms single-handedly and established the foundation of modern lives of polity, economic behaviors, education, health, property regulations, etc.

Bentham was severely criticised by many a thinkers our age. Particularly his concept of "panopticism" was the paradigmatic shift in understanding the nature of power. Michel Fouacult raised this question in his masterpiece, Discipline and Punish". In our time power is invisible, scattered, but penetrative and disciplinary. Bentham was also a defender of free market. He also advocated for the National Charity Company and Industry-houses to look after the poverty of the factory labourers. But he was equally wary about the certain pro-poor policies, and its pervasive impact over the industry, particularly, the poor laws of England, which were enacted to pay the outdoor reliefs to the labourers and other grants-in-aid, to promote the quintessential right to life, which were affecting the smooth functions of the industry. In spite of all sharp criticisms, I won't seem to be absurd enough to say that Jeremy Bentham was the visionary reformer who avoided the inclination of becoming an expert over far-sightedness . His life-long works are entirely inspirational which cannot erased from the societal-pysche.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the

Violence of Law and Ethics of Care

The worldliness of world is constituted by care (Martin Heidegger). Only in our concernfull dealing with the things around, the existence of being may be understood. In our everydayness of care and concern the world appears to our consciousness. Care is the language, a nomos of our existence, yet it is hardly perceptible in a world of law, which was rightly defined by Hans Kelsen and Max Weber as “legitimate use of violence”. The monopoly of political state over the violent nature of law makes it the most elevated institutions in relation to various social orders co-existing with the political state. Politics, once conceived as “an art of possibilities” by Harold Laski, is now becoming merely a language of allegations, counter-allegations, trickery and manipulation, in one statement, it symbolizes the archetypical character of violence whose expression is apparent in the existence of law. Violence has become our mode of existence in a sense that it speaks through us when the humanity f