Skip to main content

Ghost of History: Living with Dead Men


Portrait Source: innerself.com


We listen and communicate with dead people. They live in us, in our languages, concepts, history, societies, literature, mythology, and so on. They talk to us in the technology of language, in fact, we talk to them in their language; we carry on our identity and the concept of identity, thanks to their ingenuous gift. In the pursuit of our blaming gesture, history and society blame to each-other. History responds our presence with their glorious misadventure and ridicules our present societies, its mediocrity, baseness, and its all too normal abnormalities. Contemporary societies are always already in transition; visit its past with glorified vision to select a few dots, suitable to current necessity, but rejects many painful stories, tragedies, cruelties. History has been a source of legitimacy of contemporary societies and vice versa; cultural mythology must be the father of civilization. What makes civilization possible in the first place? Against whom this myth making activity is pursued? It seems, only language is the difference between animality and civility. It is humans who have a sense of shame and modesty and a grammar of ethics. Humans struggle for glory and superiority. Thanks to language, we have surrendered our lives to the language and its myth making abilities. Humankind has put everything at stake for language within language. Language is the root of cultural, history, and civilization. Without language what would be with us? All sense of history and society and uninterruptible communication with dead people won't be possible without language. But then, are we able to talk with fellow beings in contemporary scenarios? Language is also the limit of our world, a fine philosopher once remarked in his Magnum opus, which he contradicted in his second but the last work of his life (Ludwig Wittgenstein). Language in the "age of media" is collapsing, it is already on the verge of abuse. It's unimaginable to accuse someone without language. The logocentric existence of discourse won't be possible without it. On the contrary, animality is also a construction of language. Animals haven't defined what nature they have been possessing. They are able to communicate in their own way. Humankind has been "othering" and bothering animals within their discourse and culture. We are carrying on the dead greatness and the greatness of dead people in our languages. The whole archive is the witness of this reality. Animals other than us have no "archive fever" (Jacques Derrida). We have privilege to interpret others, but are we aware if we are also interpreted by "other animals?" We essentialize what it means to be animal after excluding what it means to be human. This dichotomy of civilization and animality is no longer sustainable in the visible present. Othering is a construct of history, a burden of dead men, we often carry on without thinking about their futility. Clash of civilization is no longer a threat to human existence. It is clash of othering animals, using them for food, medicine, and cosmetic products have alienated humans from their own nature. Our journey of egotistic conflicts is navigating on surface of huge gigantic universe.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet...
1 comment
Read more

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Violence of Law and Ethics of Care

The worldliness of world is constituted by care (Martin Heidegger). Only in our concernfull dealing with the things around, the existence of being may be understood. In our everydayness of care and concern the world appears to our consciousness. Care is the language, a nomos of our existence, yet it is hardly perceptible in a world of law, which was rightly defined by Hans Kelsen and Max Weber as “legitimate use of violence”. The monopoly of political state over the violent nature of law makes it the most elevated institutions in relation to various social orders co-existing with the political state. Politics, once conceived as “an art of possibilities” by Harold Laski, is now becoming merely a language of allegations, counter-allegations, trickery and manipulation, in one statement, it symbolizes the archetypical character of violence whose expression is apparent in the existence of law. Violence has become our mode of existence in a sense that it speaks through us when the humanity f...
Post a Comment
Read more