Skip to main content

Basic Structure: Message Lost in Definition

Doctrine of Basic Structure has been subject matter of contention since Kesavananda Bharti case. Many argue that this doctrine is not in line with the democratic principle for a republican state like India. One of the arguments is generally advanced that it is abstract, vague, and ready to be misinterpreted in many ways, particularly this doctrine endows unlimited powers to judges, which cannot be checked by other organs of state. It is often argued that basic structure must be defined once for all time. Strangely, no society is able to define what is their core ethos. Ethical dimensions of each society are as evolutionary as life and death of each and everything. Ethics is as organically dynamic as the planetary systems or the expanding universe. There is no single definition of what is a good way of life. There cannot be, in fact, a single unifying definition. The quest to define each and everything is the highest misadventure one may imagine. It's like a mountain of sands; the moment a definition is vehemently put forth it is bound to miss the spirit of evolutionary development. It's like Deleuzean difference which encompasses in its domain every simulacra as the purest form, not to be exiled like a Platonist idea, but to be immanently rooted in the experience of daily reality. Purity of simulacra is not to be compared with the divine grace. There is no fall from a divine grace. Every event, in fact, is purely new, fresh, and alive. Basic is not meant to be static. There is nothing like full stop. Death itself is as alive as a living body. Definition is arbitrary creation of thought which is advanced to make something abstract. However, all our experiences are passing through a diverse set of trajectories on concrete level. 

In a recent column, authored by Aankhi Ghosh, titled "Let's Define the Core, published in The Indian Express (Sept. 22, 2020), author is not able to appreciate the nature of judicial function. She argues that judiciary failed during the national emergency to uphold the civil liberty, however judiciary includes High courts and Subordinate courts as well. It is a matter of fact that the High Courts across the country played a very crucial role in the protection of civil liberty for many deprived citizens of India. Second, the function of judiciary is not to be an abstract articulator of what basic structure really is, rather it evolves case to case basis on concrete level. Basic Structure doctrine is important to safeguard the fundamental principles of constitution. On the aspect of Constitutional provisions, Parliament is free to deliberate, amend, substitute, or modify the provisions. However, such changes must not violate the basic ethos of Indian Constitution. Because, basic structure is those fundamental principles which establish the fundamental law of the land.The concept of "basic" cannot be defined once for all. Just like Constitution cannot be static. It requires constant amendments. Likewise, the concept of basic is dynamic, evolutionary; it must accept the normative change of history and society, for judiciary is the guardian of Constitution. It is meant to protect the fundamental norms of the Constitution and to make it adaptable and concrete in due course of time. She has crafted her arguments in the column  under the umbrella of analytical tradition which is not able to comprehend the larger scope of judicial function.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet
1 comment
Read more

Same Sex Marriage Verdict: Apolitical Politics of Court

Every judgment of the Constitutional court solves and unsolves certain fundamental questions. Court often takes two steps forward and one step backward (Shklar). Navtej Johar was rightly celebrated as a progressive judgment which recognised same sex relationships on the touchstone of constitutional morality. In a way, judgment progressively explored the colonial and post-colonial politics and reviewed Section 377, IPC from the perspective of constitutional morality emanating from the "objective purposive interpretation",  a concept devised by Justice Aharon Barack, a former judge of Israel Supreme Court. NALSA judgment already went ahead with the recommendations to broaden the scope of reservation policy in India to allow the constitutional protection of sexual minorities. The latest judgment has attracted widespread criticism from the intellectuals. Many of them have argued that the Court has not taken its responsibility in protecting the rights of sexual minorities. There i
Post a Comment
Read more

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the
Post a Comment
Read more