Skip to main content

Why to be Enlightened?


One of my philosopher friends has raised this question. Why to be Enlightened? What does really Enlightenment mean? Most of the people believe in the philosophy of "no philosophy" but dogmas. How far dogmas remain away from the philosophical tradition of inquiry? Can we say that dogmas are very much part of the knowledge system? Every dictionary dares to define it, but miserably fails in that process, because human being has potential to raise the bar! Dogmas are governed through belief system; every thing which is believed is yet to be expounded, yet to be ascertained, howsoever one tries to know, as much as one knows, even bigger domain remains away from her cognition. Reason cannot be attributed to every darker spot, because it has its own existence. One will million time fail if he or she tries to find out the darker spots through the lens of light. Why don't you accept that light is no longer an exclusive reality, it is darkness which defines it. Enlightenment is not about knowledge or belief. It is about courage to speak by heart, courage to taste the bitter fruit, courage to know what is unknowable, courage to stand and deliver amidst adversity. Immanuel Kant mediated on this theme in search of moral laws for humankind. Whether he failed or people failed him is an evergreen question? But he at least dared to stand, to challenge the pervasity of pessimism. Remember friends, he was not doing this for the sake of stardom or boredom. He was doing this for the sake of doing because for him human life is not merely a means to an end, in fact, it is an end itself. Nobody can deny that the sentimental character are integrally connected to every existing being in this Universe. But to say that one is sentimental is not Enlightened is a question which needs to be deliberated again. For me, enlightenment is not an epoch to attain, but an attitude to inculcate; not to be cynical about what is happening, but to find a reason to say, Life is really Good my friend!
Thanks a lot for reading me patiently!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...

The Glory of Belief Industry

Disappearance of questions is the pre-condition of artificial certainty. Therefore, it is profitable investment to establish and sustain the belief industry. This industry produces the efficient Man whose substratum is not the divine soul or mental faculty but a non-thinking mind which militantly conform the group solidarity of the masses. When answers are easily available and generated by the Artificial Intelligence, who will take the pain for thinking and unthinking or deliberating to develop logical capacity or for establishing the paradigm of truth? As Ashis Nandy explains the creative process which requires to meditate with the questions and to remain with the questions for a longer period of time to create and unveil the mask of deception. The artistry in epistemic creativity necessitates the patience caring of the questions. The cultivation and exploration of questions and mitigated skepticism to unravel what is said and unsaid, the expressions and silences. Even so called Dark ...