Skip to main content

Justice: My Strange Friend

I am writing here to express my life experience regarding justice, which has been not so soothing experience over the years. Justice is not, as per my cognitive capability, a fact to be deciphered through senses. Justice is not an idea which is so complete. Substantially, justice is not a concept which is fundamental in defining the building blocks of human’s life. Justice, rather, is an arbitrary expectation on the part of subject, which sometimes remains internally encaged within the ethical verses of an ego, other times, it appears as an expectation in due course of societal behaviors and relationships. Justice is painted as a sacred desire which appears to be sacrosanct in limine, however, with the passage of age all the sacred dreams are shattered and an innocent mind, who was happy under some hallucinated reality, suffers from irretrievable breakdown. From there only, justice appears to be a dead concept. Might appears at site, the true law of nature; a real law of society. Justice for a privileged one is to protect that privilege. Justice for a rich one is cause impoverish human conditions for others for the sake of relative richness to be preserved for perpetuity. 

Humans are by nature the laziest being on the planet, compromised its capacity to be ferociously just in desire of leisure and pleasure. For they have created a myth of order and security. What is so stable and secure, except putrefaction of spirit and energy? Dogmatic leap of humans has doomed their fate. They have been cursed for their capacity to justify each sin, committed against enfeebled animals and plants. Justice remains as a utopian dream in the mind of virtuous soul, once that sleep is disturbed, reality is here; a treacherous person can earn money and respect in human’s society. A virtuous sentient being is bound to suffer from the merciless extermination of profound wisdom. In fact, justice is inaccessible when one cries for its majestic effects. Justice is accessible only through the voice of mightiest. Machiavelli’s poisonous philosophy reminds me the real world, when he writes, “It is better to be feared than to be loved”. (Machiavelli, The Prince). Only power, cruel power is the reality. Justice is a legitimate mask which justifies the dominance over weak. Justice is an act of labeling to exclude the the fruit from a labeled obnoxious tree. Virtue is a Christian value which has caused the ferociousness of human’s animality! You take every foundation of justice; every edifice is a sheer result of "politics of power" and the exclusion of enfeebles. 

Justice must be liberated from a dogmatic belief that it is achievable by anyone. It must be emancipated from the semantics politics of hegemons. In a world of hyper-reality what else could be expected from the fox, except treacherous demands, and insincere commitments!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet

Same Sex Marriage Verdict: Apolitical Politics of Court

Every judgment of the Constitutional court solves and unsolves certain fundamental questions. Court often takes two steps forward and one step backward (Shklar). Navtej Johar was rightly celebrated as a progressive judgment which recognised same sex relationships on the touchstone of constitutional morality. In a way, judgment progressively explored the colonial and post-colonial politics and reviewed Section 377, IPC from the perspective of constitutional morality emanating from the "objective purposive interpretation",  a concept devised by Justice Aharon Barack, a former judge of Israel Supreme Court. NALSA judgment already went ahead with the recommendations to broaden the scope of reservation policy in India to allow the constitutional protection of sexual minorities. The latest judgment has attracted widespread criticism from the intellectuals. Many of them have argued that the Court has not taken its responsibility in protecting the rights of sexual minorities. There i

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the