Skip to main content

Politics of/for Faith: Sabrimala and Transcendental Constitutionalism


Sabrimala issue has been streched up to  extent that it has become a defining moment for 'politics of faith' instead of 'politics for faith' (here I am borrowing the term of Max Weber, Politics as a Vocation). Supreme Court, in its acquired role of theologian (as again and again 'essential practices doctrine' is used by the Apex Court of the Country to decide which practice is essential and which is not), reading customs and traditions at the anvil of "Constitutional Morality". This term is too vague to take any concrete meaning. Though, text like this has been effectively used by the Court in recent judgments to ensure the march of "Constitutional Renaissance" on our Planet (Dipak Misra, J. has coined this term). As a student of Constitutional Law, I admire the zeal of judges to innovate terms, however its meaning is missing if I try to contextualize it. "Constitution is a social document", if I remember Granville Austin's The Cornerstone of Nation. As a social document, the Constitution can not be imprisoned within arbitrary imaginations of few judges. It should keep reflecting the aims and aspirations of governed. In that sense, any such presumptive innovation would override all the diversified cultures, customs; especially India is not a nation of monotonic culture; it is a culture various cultures. While judging these beliefs and cultures through spectle of "Transcendental Constitutionalism, one will do more harm than good. Sabrimala is though a welcome step, which may be symbolically rejecting purity-impurity notions, biased against women. But, a principle like "Constitutional Morality" is bound to be a tool to test each esoteric standing amidst society at the touchstone one single principle; constitutional morality.

One of the fundamental questions regarding faith, is to solve the puzzle whether God protects or preserves humans? Or it is humans who are capable to protect God? If latter is true then faith appears to be absent the moment humans become the guardian in protection of God. All the religious conflicts have one common concern; my faith should be intact at the cost of subjugation and persecution of others. Every faith qualifies as a faith the moment one surrenders oneself before the expectations, in hope that my expectation would be materialised (here borrowing the notion of Sundar Sarukkai, The Paradox of Faith, The Hindu, October 29, 2018). Without faith no being can survive on this planet. Life and faith, in that sense, are synonyms to each-other. But to stretch the faith up to the moment it becomes a tool to gain other external things; crisis of faith results into the loss of very possibilities of esoteric beauty. Sabrimala judgment preceds over transcendental theoligism to engender gender justice. And those who are opposing it in the name of faith is already trapped in the quagmire of faith. The externality of faith is the reason for exclusionary politics. True faith in God rejects externalities. God needs no protection; God knows no corruption or pollution. Because God is not an entity to celebrate. It is an idea of perfection; the highest wisdom; the ultimate truth; the source of creation and destruction. If it is so; why are we fighting in the name of highest wisdom?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...
Post a Comment
Read more

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sterile Preoccupation: Towards Technocracy and Loss of Human

William Blake, Newton (1795 ) Roland Barthes reminds us, looks us back from his grave, and constantly warns us about the mythological character of human life, our society, and the relationship of human with the life-systems, whereas symbolic profusions outweigh rational contemplation, emotive appeals are strategically manoeuvred for the deceptive promises and considerations, rhetorical narratives are deployed to symbolize the virtue of unbounded eloquences, significances, and exemplifying extravagances of meanings, ritualistic and mechanical productions of narratives, and seductions towards efficacy as instrumentalised worldview have relegated human relationships to the status of mechanization and technocratizations. What is so significant about the mechanisation of thinking and ritualistic institutionalisation? If not the loss of humanistic elements in the human relationships and the relationships of human species from their nature, ecosystem, and the life-systems itself. What is so p...
2 comments
Read more