Skip to main content

Meditation on Observer and Observed


Picture Source: www.kfoundation.org

Universe is a question? How does it accomplish as a function to exist? Whether it reveals in me or particularity as a fragment cannot grasp the totality? What is time? A movement of thought, a function, or having any substantive value at all? I find a penetrative discussion on these themes by two philosophers, Jiddu Krishnamurti and David Bohm. Krishnamurti asked to observe the structure and nature of thoughts, its movements, to grasp the thinker or observer, as well as thought itself. He finds that observer is observed and thinker is a sum of thoughts. There is no possibility of psychological time unless there is a movement of thought. Time is nothing but movement. Once thought is observed as a material process, there appears to be a fundamental change in the perception of reality. It's like "awareness is watching awareness", or thought is observing thoughts. David Bohm substantiates this  theme in these words:

"We already had this point that the observer cannot be separated from the observed. In fact, whenever you observe, the thing observed is changed because it cannot by this interaction be reduced below a certain level. Therefore, you have the transformation of the object observed in the act of observation. I had already noted the similarity to consciousness: that if you try to observe your thought in any detail, the whole train of thought changes. That is clear. So therefore you cannot have the separation of the observer and the observed in consciousness".

In the process of observing thoughts, mind becomes still, and in its stillness, mind connects to the universal reality, the infinite energies, in form of love and compassion. That is what J. Krishnamurti referred as "intelligence". In that state, there is total awareness about what is happening inside mind and outside. According to David Bohm:

"I felt that there was a parallel between what is in consciousness and what is in matter in general, and I felt movement was also a question, that the movement that you see outside, you feel inside. In general therefore, I felt that we directly apprehended the nature of reality in our own being".

In fact, we waste our energies in creating and imposing images about who we are. In that sense, identities are conditioned and fragmentary. Once we are aware about its limitation, its state of confusion, there appears to be no process of being judgmental, but to proceed for an inquiry. In that process, one, who prefers to listen authority, takes help of any book, blocks the possibility to have an inquiry, to know what's happening here and now? Inquiry begins with watching everything, including our own thought process, its structure and functioning, and to accept the limitations of our all conditioned thoughts. Life as sacred reveals to those minds only, who find no craving for psychological security, a fear of loosing something in future, and a fear of projection. Once thought is carefully watched, it starts loosing its vitality as a supreme condition of being and time. Then mind moves into a territory of unknown, fresh, vital. And what's bliss if it doesn't transcend a mechanical life of repeating self in fear of loosing what have been acquired hitherto? The projection of becoming is our limit condition. Only Being is real if thought as a movement of past experiences does not shapes our observation. In words of J. Krishnamurti, 

"Truth is a pathless land. Man cannot come to it through any organisation, through any creed, through any dogma, priest or ritual, nor through any philosophic knowledge or psychological technique. He has to find it through the mirror of relationship, through the understanding of the contents of his own mind, through observation and not through intellectual analysis or introspective dissection".

The eternal possibility of watching things as it is could be achieved in the state of no being, no time, no movement of thought, but being there, feeling the freshness of love and compassion. Being one as a Universal mind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet...

Feminine Mystery

        Portrait Courtesy: Shraddha One day when 'I' die  All would born as free life The long struggle to be Would turn out to be a mirage  Whose mystery is long known But forgotten Every concern or engagement Is an escape to forget  The first germ of life; its completeness Shackles are nowhere  But imagined as real One day that image would disappear And a blank sheet would represent The Being and Nothingness My mother my light  Has merged into the shadow To witness the geist  Glittering in every particle  All around ether  One day when I laugh On the seriousness of playfulness And let the things flow  Without any expectation or resistance The day would be a new dawn To the spirit of wholeness And unity of phenomenon Fragmented in an age of reason And anarchus egoism of individuals  One day the expression of collective Would loose its relevance  When man would realise The silent spirit  And its feminine mys...

เคชिเคฐोเคคा เคœाเคŠँ เคเค• เคฎाเคฒा เฅ›िเคจ्เคฆเค—ी เค•ा

เคชเฅเคคा เคนूँ เคนเคฐ เคเค• เคฆिเคจ เคเค• เคนी เคชเคจ्เคจा, เคนเคฐ เคฆिเคจ เคนเฅ›ाเคฐ เคฏे เคฎाเคฒूเคฎ เคชเฅœเคคे เคนैं। เคœเคฌเคธे เคนोเคถ เคธंเคญाเคฒा เคนै เคเค• เคนी เคชเคจ्เคจा เคธเคตांเคฐเคคे เค†เคฏा เคนूँ, เคฒोเค— เค‡เคธे เฅ›िเคจ्เคฆเค—ी เค•เคนเคคे เคนैं। เค‡เคธเคชे เคฒिเค–े เคนเคฐ เคเค• เคฒเคฌ्เฅ› เคœो เคฎेเคฐे เคฎाเคฒूเคฎ เคชเฅœเคคे เคนैं, เคจा เคœाเคจे เค•िเคคเคจे เคœुเคฌां เคชे เคšเฅे เคนोंเค—े। เค†เคœ เคนเคฎ เคญी เค•ुเค› เคชเคฒ เค•े เคฒिเค เคนी เคธเคนी เค‡เคธเค•े เคธाเคฐเคฅी เคนैं, เคœाเคจे เคธे เคชเคนเคฒे เค•ुเค› เคฐंเค— เคฎेเคฐा เคญी เค‡เคธเคชे เคšเฅ เคœाเค, เคฌเคธ เค‡เคธीเคฒिเค เคเค• เคนी เคชเคจ्เคจा เคฌाเคฐ เคฌाเคฐ เคชเคฒเคŸเคคा เคฐเคนเคคा เคนूँ। เคนเคฐ เค•ोเคˆ เค…เคจเคœाเคจे เค•िเคคाเคฌ เค•ी เคคเคฒाเคถ เคฎें เคฌाเคนเคฐ เคจिเค•เคฒเคคा เคนै, เคœिเคธเค•ा เคนเคฐ เคเค• เคชเคจ्เคจा เคตो เฅ™ुเคฆ เคนै। เคœเคฌ เฅ™ुเคฆ เค•े เคฐंเค— เค•ो เคธเคฎเค เคนी เคจा เคชाเคฏा, เคคो เคญเคฒा เค‡ंเคฆ्เคฐเคงเคจुเคทी เค•िเคคाเคฌ เค•े เค•्เคฏा เคฎाเคฏเคจे เคนैं? เค…เคธ्เคคिเคค्เคต เคฎें เคจा เคœाเคจे เค•िเคคเคจे เคชเคจ्เคจे เคฌिเค–เคฐे เคชเฅœे เคนैं, เคฌเคธ เคเค• เคธे เคนी เค…เคตเค—เคค เคนो เคœाเคŠँ, เค‰เคธเค•े เคนเคฐ เคเค• เคถเคฌ्เคฆ เค•ो เคšुเคจเคคा เคœाเคŠँ, เค•ुเค› เคชเคฒ เค•े เคฒिเคฏे เคธเคนी, เคชिเคฐोเคคा เคœाเคŠँ เคเค• เคฎाเคฒा เฅ›िเคจ्เคฆเค—ी เค•ा।