Skip to main content

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Two Mirrors of Our Civilization


Tribalism is one of the most quoted terms, especially those voices, who are defenders of open societies. Merriam Webster dictionary defines it as "exaltation of the tribe above other groups", or "strong in-group loyalty". The etymological root of the term "Tribe" is from French "Tribu" and Latin "Tribus". In Rome, there were three (tri) divisions of the people. Division has a natural root. Factionalism is prevalent in the animal world. In civilization, it was desirable to avoid it. Because, civilization has been considered as the "triumph of reason" over instinct and emotions. The classical political tradition of Europe visualized that the emergence of nation state is not simply a social contract, agreed by people to form a commonwealth, rather a feeling of commonness from the cultural perspective was cultivated to establish nation-states. The Treaty of the Peace of Westphalia does not simply signifies a triumph of reason, or the instrument of contract among the people. It was deeply based upon the psychology of us v. them. That was the reason why Europe experimented with the idea of secularism and secularization. While secularism was meant to establish a civil government on the basis of civil and political morality, and a separation thesis was accepted in toto. Secularization was altogether a radical idea to transform religions into "scientific morality", and to cultivate among the citizens a critical attitude towards given, so as to improve and progress. But the edifice of secularism couldn't erase from the public memory the very idea of identity and factionalism. Becoming critical to each-other is a very easy task. All you have to do is to suspect everything. One of the great philosophers of ancient time, Nagarjuna demonstrated the power of reason and argument by  "Prasanga" method, whereby reason annihilates itself. The problem with suspicion is that it doesn't start with self. One suspects outsiders as responsible for his miseries. One continuously blames others for all the catastrophic events occur in his life. 

The emergence of modernity a casual connection with extreme religious wars, dogmatism, superstitious beliefs, violence for parochial identity. But what did it produce? Colonialism, imperialism and extreme cruelty against nature and people. Whether factionalism has vanished from our life? The answer is "no".The "scientific rationality" produced some severe catastrophic events, such as Hiroshima and Nagasaki, genocide and the terror of Nazi regime in the name of scientific  experimentation and anti-Semitism, Bhopal Gas tragedy and the gross injustice for the survivors, and so on.

In the very genesis of polarity, violence is inevitable. Creation is one but created ones are fragmented by their parochial identities. Life is one but the political fragmentation has cut it into pieces. "Kingdom of reason" has equally failed us. 

In politics, the value of service is nowhere; in a nomenclature of Max Weber, we have "vocation of politics" rather than "vocation for politics". Politicians are mostly guided by their inherent interests rather than a larger goal of people's welfare. British parliamentary system evolved with a deep suspicion against "public reasoning". Because, it was presumed that people's representatives shall work in the larger goal than small interests. But in fact, the history of parliamentary system is not that glorious and exemplar in many ways. The question of tribalism still remains alive as ever before. It appears that tribal society is more innocent than one, in which, we live in. No civilization is able to eradicate the malaise of factionalism. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the two mirrors of our fragmentary and parochial lives. And the future of human's society is bleak unless a course correction is not devised urgently. The fundamental basis of our existence is co-operation, love, sympathy, and kindness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...

The Glory of Belief Industry

Disappearance of questions is the pre-condition of artificial certainty. Therefore, it is profitable investment to establish and sustain the belief industry. This industry produces the efficient Man whose substratum is not the divine soul or mental faculty but a non-thinking mind which militantly conform the group solidarity of the masses. When answers are easily available and generated by the Artificial Intelligence, who will take the pain for thinking and unthinking or deliberating to develop logical capacity or for establishing the paradigm of truth? As Ashis Nandy explains the creative process which requires to meditate with the questions and to remain with the questions for a longer period of time to create and unveil the mask of deception. The artistry in epistemic creativity necessitates the patience caring of the questions. The cultivation and exploration of questions and mitigated skepticism to unravel what is said and unsaid, the expressions and silences. Even so called Dark ...