Skip to main content

Long Live Democracy

Roots of Democracy, a piece written by Abhishek Banerjee and Sumedha Verma Ojha for the Indian Express, suggests about the ancient roots of republic and democracy in India. It is a fact visible across all the diverse literatures of the past. But the real question is not about its identities or the place of origin, instead, the problem lies in generalisation. It's an easy task to generalise an assumption to create a narrative about backwardness or progress, tradition or modernity, and status or contract, etc. Behind every generalisation, there is a case of cognitive or epistemological biasness. Before generalisation one must think about its opposite and try to investigate if opposite is equally true?


In our world of values, there is not a single value exists as truth without  co-relation to its opposites. Likewise, democracy is not an institution or state of being rather an attitude. And every attitude has its opposites simultaneously. One can be democratic at the cost of non-democratic tendencies visible inside him or her. Similarly, no society could be canvassed as one version of truth at the cost of compromising with its opposites. In that sense, Ancient India was an amalgamation of all the diverse attitudes. Democracy and republican values were prevalent there not exclusively, but within a general tendency of autocracy and monarchy. 


India in post-colonial period is not a society transformed by colonial masters who, as claimed, taught or imposed the democratic ethos over Indians. She has its own ancient roots of democracy or republicanism. But can we say all Indians are democratic by their attitude even after getting independence from their colonial past? Answer would be obviously "no". Official works in modern-India demonstrate the working culture of babus, kiranis, or officers. Persons on official positions often enjoy powers so much so that they often forget what are their roles in the office? Obviously, this tendency cannot be generalised. But predominantly this spirit is visible in the offices of post-colonial India.  Someone, who is appointed to serve, makes it reverse and rules over the masses with impunity. And masses are often ignorant about their roles in a democratic set-up remain "ready to be exploited". And literate people are too docile and conditioned that their knowledge of civility becomes useless in a practical world of experience. In such a condition, democracy becomes a symbol instead of attitude, a mark of celebration instead of working culture, a rhetorics of politicians instead of a way of life. Dr. Ambedkar's vision of democracy was social democracy, which is related to the human's attitude to embrace differences instead of making it symbolically true in the name of political democracy. India, in that sense, cannot feel proud of its ancient past unless people are ready to embrace the democratic ethos so as to find a common theme among all the diffrent modes of existence. Glorious past is no guarantee of her beautiful present or hopeful future, unless people are practicing constant vigilance to check the autocratic or anti-democratic tendencies.


Long Live Democracy!!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet...
1 comment
Read more

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Violence of Law and Ethics of Care

The worldliness of world is constituted by care (Martin Heidegger). Only in our concernfull dealing with the things around, the existence of being may be understood. In our everydayness of care and concern the world appears to our consciousness. Care is the language, a nomos of our existence, yet it is hardly perceptible in a world of law, which was rightly defined by Hans Kelsen and Max Weber as “legitimate use of violence”. The monopoly of political state over the violent nature of law makes it the most elevated institutions in relation to various social orders co-existing with the political state. Politics, once conceived as “an art of possibilities” by Harold Laski, is now becoming merely a language of allegations, counter-allegations, trickery and manipulation, in one statement, it symbolizes the archetypical character of violence whose expression is apparent in the existence of law. Violence has become our mode of existence in a sense that it speaks through us when the humanity f...
Post a Comment
Read more