Skip to main content

THE ROLE OF GOVERNOR IN A DEMOCRACY (INDIA)

"The President, or the Governor or Rajpramukh of a State, shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any act done or purporting to be done by him in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties" (Art. 361, The Constitution of India). The black letter law suggests that in order to facilitate the free excersize of Executive powers and duties (functions) of the President of India or the Governor of the State, their actions are not answerable to any Court. However, the discretion excersized by these Constitutional Authorities is not immune from the domain of judicial review. Every discretion excersized in arbitrary manner is susceptible to judicial review. In  Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006), the Apex Court declared the imposition of President's rule U/A- 356 of the Indian Constitution as unconstitutional. In one of paras, while dealing with the role of Governor, the Apex Court referred the statement of then Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, "You are the representatives of the center in states and hence, you bring a national perspective to state level actions and activities" (Emphasis Supplied).

In the present Karnataka issue, there might be at least two ways to think this specific situation. The technical or mechanical compliance of Law may favour BJP. However, in Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006), The Supreme Court of India, while dealing with the moment of crisis like hung Assembly and Dissolution of Assembly, came out with three possible alternatives in lexical priority, taking clue from Sarkaria Commission: (1) The Biggest pre-poll alliance has the first claim to form the Government; (2) The Single Largest Party; and (3) The biggest post- poll alliance. Here BJP passes the muster for the second condition and the Congress- JD(S) post-poll alliance qualifies for the third condition. These alternatives were also echoed by Punchhi Commission. But in Rameshwar Prasad (Supra), the Supreme Court of India echoed the pragmatic voice of Sarkaria Commission in these few words:

"It is clear that the leader of the party which has an absolute majority in the Legislative Assembly should invariably be called upon by the Governor to form a Government. However, if there is a fractured mandate, then the Commission recommends an elaborate step-by-step approach and has further emphasized that 'the Governor, while going through the process of selection as described, should select a leader who, in his judgement, is most likely to command a  majority in the Assembly'". 

It's difficult to say how to read the Constitution, even more difficult to articulate how not to read it.  A serious student of Constitutional Law should avoid reading the Constitution in terms of Black letter interpretation. The study of Constitution is not only in its expressions but in its "silences" (See Chelameshwar J. In 4th Judges' case). Every political crisis or "Politics of Crisis" brings forth the bright scope to transform Constitutional interpretation in sync with crisis, to reaffirm the very "demosprudential ethos" (Upendra Baxi, Jurisprudence v. Demosprudence) which is expected from every Constitutional Authority. The power of Governor is a symbolic one in a republican democracy like India. They are responsible, not only to adhere with every text and its context of the Constitution, but also the very Constitutional ethos, which is no less than to raise upto the stature of Justice, Equity, and good Conscience. 

When numbers are prima facie supporting the Congress-JD(S) alliance. Asking BJP to form the Government is an act of negation and abdication; not only of the precedents established in Goa and Manipur in contemporary epoch, where post-poll alliance got preference over the single largest party, but also the Constitutional ethos which asks the Governor to be above the suspicion like a Caesar's Wife!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...
Post a Comment
Read more

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sterile Preoccupation: Towards Technocracy and Loss of Human

William Blake, Newton (1795 ) Roland Barthes reminds us, looks us back from his grave, and constantly warns us about the mythological character of human life, our society, and the relationship of human with the life-systems, whereas symbolic profusions outweigh rational contemplation, emotive appeals are strategically manoeuvred for the deceptive promises and considerations, rhetorical narratives are deployed to symbolize the virtue of unbounded eloquences, significances, and exemplifying extravagances of meanings, ritualistic and mechanical productions of narratives, and seductions towards efficacy as instrumentalised worldview have relegated human relationships to the status of mechanization and technocratizations. What is so significant about the mechanisation of thinking and ritualistic institutionalisation? If not the loss of humanistic elements in the human relationships and the relationships of human species from their nature, ecosystem, and the life-systems itself. What is so p...
2 comments
Read more