Skip to main content

Reflection on A History of Desire in India

Infinite Variety: A History of Desire in India, a book of its own kind, explores multi-cultural aspects of desire in India. This important work compels me to re-think the contemporary dimensions of gender, identity, and sexuality, which appeared through colonial pen, constructed and produced some mono-static truths and a few exclusive binaries, which conceived and widened the gap of two extreme poles of desire: "hetero v. homo". She went to question Michel Foucault's construction of "ars erotica", a gift of rest v. "scientia sexualis, developed in the confessions of west. For India itself had both the dimensions in public life. Sexuality was not condemned to remain as secret and private. It was kept at equal footing to Dharma, Yoga, Kama, Artha, Moksha. When the west colonised the rest, it was not purely a utilitarian ethics to develop the science of sex, rather the values they espoused through Victorian morality was transported which led Macaulay to develop Section 377, IPC. India was a country of multiple cultures, customs, languages, perspectives, festivals. Ancient India or even medieval India was far more progressive in thoughts and practices;  discursive and non-discursive dimensions of sexuality were far more open and public. It was not attached in teleological sense, to procreation and marital obligations. Desire was taken very seriously, not merely as a means but an end in itself. Western principles of confessions, emerged from Christianity, became a part of literary pleasures from St. Augustine to Rousseau, then reduced as a pyscho-analytical tool by Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler, Carl Jung, and many more. Confession as a paradigm developed a "science of desire", which was grounded in body and its caress. To the contrary, ars erotica was far more free from any pedagogical anxiety, it was lived rather than imagined.

Madhavi Menon's Infinite variety deconstructs every sense of standard in genealogical style. Standard, as we know, is already under attack from the post-modernist minds, and in physics quantum mechanics has already challenged the meta-hypothesis of reality. In such an exciting epoch, Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle appears to be "episteme" of our truth making. It sounds faucauldian but in fact it negates that very standard also.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...
Post a Comment
Read more

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Glory of Belief Industry

Disappearance of questions is the pre-condition of artificial certainty. Therefore, it is profitable investment to establish and sustain the belief industry. This industry produces the efficient Man whose substratum is not the divine soul or mental faculty but a non-thinking mind which militantly conform the group solidarity of the masses. When answers are easily available and generated by the Artificial Intelligence, who will take the pain for thinking and unthinking or deliberating to develop logical capacity or for establishing the paradigm of truth? As Ashis Nandy explains the creative process which requires to meditate with the questions and to remain with the questions for a longer period of time to create and unveil the mask of deception. The artistry in epistemic creativity necessitates the patience caring of the questions. The cultivation and exploration of questions and mitigated skepticism to unravel what is said and unsaid, the expressions and silences. Even so called Dark ...
Post a Comment
Read more