Skip to main content

Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments

The Scottish thinker Adam Smith, one of the leading thinkers of Scottish enlightenment, advocated in his seminal work, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, for the "Induction of Reason" for moral and political judgments; his moral convictions were based upon the virtue of propriety, well being of self and others. His remarkable thesis of Impartial Spectator, "the eye of mankind" posed an opposite point of view from social contractarian approach of Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Rawls. He was an admirer of comparative approach towards moral and political philosophy. He had global vision   for humanity, for he considered social inequality a major problem for non-access of good life and leisure than natural disabilities. Smith's vision of "Self Love" (Wealth of Nation) and "Sympathy" (Moral sentiment) were not contradictory rather one is quoted out of its context. He was concerned with poor and advocated for the self regulation of market. 

His thesis of self love or self interest was limited for exchange and not for distribution and production activities. "Butcher and Baker" hypothesis is often quoted in isolation without looking at the complete context. He was one of the propounders of Social Choice theory, later on, Condorcet became its chief voice.  Rational choice theory, on the other hand, is limited to self interest. Smith criticized Aristotle and Plato for being silent on the issue infanticide in Greek, and East India Company for their exploitative adventures in India. He never believed in any genetic difference or white superiority thesis, rather defended the Irish for their love of potato and their extreme poverty. Smith liked comparative approach in moral and political decision makings and wanted to ensure all human beings equal and similar. He was a great advocate of impartial spectator for the reason that the local community may be trapped in  parochialism. He admired open impartiality instead of a closed one. The moral aspect of economic processes could be seen in his works which is not visible in our time, when market value is instrumental in making moral decisions. He thought that the trust is the crucial factor of economy, for example, negotiable instrument has no value in itself just like gold or silver. Trust and faith are key for the economic processes. Humankind could globally endure the suffering and existential crisis our world is suffering from. Only impartial spectator may help to make an independent judgment, which is usually affected by the  blind-spot of insiders. Remember, outside  our planet the identity of lives here on Earth is one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Meeting Justice Rohinton Nariman in a Sunday Morning

Aristotle once wrote in his Nicomachean Ethics that there are four significant virtues for human beings, namely Prudence, Temperance, Justice, and Courage. There are a few judges who have courage and sense of justice, both. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Nariman has been truly an exemplar judge and erudite historian, theologian and philologist, a great scholar of music as well as a courageous and meticulous jurist of our country. He did his Master of Laws from Harvard Law School in 1980-81 and taught by one of the finest jurists of the last century, Roberto Unger. He became Senior Advocate in 1993 in the age of 37 and also served as Solicitor General of India in 2011 before he was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India in 2014. He delivered many landmark judgments, including Shreya Singhal v. Union of India. There are a few people with whom time moves too fast, but to count that experience takes ages. Justice Rohinton Nariman is one of those great jurists with whom a meet

Same Sex Marriage Verdict: Apolitical Politics of Court

Every judgment of the Constitutional court solves and unsolves certain fundamental questions. Court often takes two steps forward and one step backward (Shklar). Navtej Johar was rightly celebrated as a progressive judgment which recognised same sex relationships on the touchstone of constitutional morality. In a way, judgment progressively explored the colonial and post-colonial politics and reviewed Section 377, IPC from the perspective of constitutional morality emanating from the "objective purposive interpretation",  a concept devised by Justice Aharon Barack, a former judge of Israel Supreme Court. NALSA judgment already went ahead with the recommendations to broaden the scope of reservation policy in India to allow the constitutional protection of sexual minorities. The latest judgment has attracted widespread criticism from the intellectuals. Many of them have argued that the Court has not taken its responsibility in protecting the rights of sexual minorities. There i

The Rhythm of Law: A Book Review

Book Cover of the Book Law is the subject and object of curiosity since the ancient civilizations started its journey of contemplation about the order within the nature; its mysterious paths inspired the germination of metaphysics. Initially, human's mode of existence lived as instinctual life as per the call of nature. Instincts were primarily used as a medium for survival and to receive the call of wisdom from the “order of nature”. Humans are primarily one of the modes of expression of the nature, as Spinoza calls it attributes which express the essence of God and modes which are derived from the essence of God or nature (Spinoza, Ethics). The doorway of all the laws, as brooding presence of harmony, may be received if one is alert to recognize its call. Prof. Raman Mittal has penned a beautiful book titled “The Rhythm of Law”. The uniqueness of the book is its potentialities to express the inexpressible wisdom. Martin Heidegger in his Magnum Opus, Being and Time, expresses the