Skip to main content

Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments

The Scottish thinker Adam Smith, one of the leading thinkers of Scottish enlightenment, advocated in his seminal work, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, for the "Induction of Reason" for moral and political judgments; his moral convictions were based upon the virtue of propriety, well being of self and others. His remarkable thesis of Impartial Spectator, "the eye of mankind" posed an opposite point of view from social contractarian approach of Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Rawls. He was an admirer of comparative approach towards moral and political philosophy. He had global vision   for humanity, for he considered social inequality a major problem for non-access of good life and leisure than natural disabilities. Smith's vision of "Self Love" (Wealth of Nation) and "Sympathy" (Moral sentiment) were not contradictory rather one is quoted out of its context. He was concerned with poor and advocated for the self regulation of market. 

His thesis of self love or self interest was limited for exchange and not for distribution and production activities. "Butcher and Baker" hypothesis is often quoted in isolation without looking at the complete context. He was one of the propounders of Social Choice theory, later on, Condorcet became its chief voice.  Rational choice theory, on the other hand, is limited to self interest. Smith criticized Aristotle and Plato for being silent on the issue infanticide in Greek, and East India Company for their exploitative adventures in India. He never believed in any genetic difference or white superiority thesis, rather defended the Irish for their love of potato and their extreme poverty. Smith liked comparative approach in moral and political decision makings and wanted to ensure all human beings equal and similar. He was a great advocate of impartial spectator for the reason that the local community may be trapped in  parochialism. He admired open impartiality instead of a closed one. The moral aspect of economic processes could be seen in his works which is not visible in our time, when market value is instrumental in making moral decisions. He thought that the trust is the crucial factor of economy, for example, negotiable instrument has no value in itself just like gold or silver. Trust and faith are key for the economic processes. Humankind could globally endure the suffering and existential crisis our world is suffering from. Only impartial spectator may help to make an independent judgment, which is usually affected by the  blind-spot of insiders. Remember, outside  our planet the identity of lives here on Earth is one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Physical Basis of Conscious Life: A Synthesis of William James's Physiological Psychology

I Introduction: Bridging Physiology and Psychology William James, in his landmark work The Principles of Psychology, provides a foundational framework connecting the brain's physiological mechanisms to the purposive, selective, and unified nature of conscious mental life. This blog analyzes James’s synthesis, which grounds psychological phenomena in the material workings of the nervous system without reducing consciousness to a mere epiphenomenon. We will explore his hierarchical model of the brain, which evolves from simple reflex actions in the lower nerve centers to the complex, deliberative functions of the cerebrum. Key themes include the role of the cerebrum as an organ of foresight and prudence, the physiological mechanism of habit as the process by which experience physically imprints itself upon the brain’s plastic matter, and consciousness's essential function as a “selecting agency” that is causally efficacious in steering the organism toward its own interests. Ultim...

Martin Heidegger's Deconstruction of the History of Ontology

I  Introduction In the opening pages of his magnum opus, Being and Time, Martin Heidegger resurrects a question he argues has been buried for millennia, framing his entire project with an epigraph from Plato’s Sophist: “For manifestly you have long been aware of what you mean when you use the expression ‘being’. We, however, who used to think we understood it, have now become perplexed.” This is no mere academic exercise but a deliberate reawakening of what Heidegger argues is the most fundamental and, paradoxically, the most forgotten question in the history of Western thought. For Heidegger, a pervasive “forgetfulness of Being” has characterized philosophy since antiquity, where the initial, vibrant inquiry into what it means “to be” solidified into a series of unexamined dogmas. The question was not answered and then set aside; rather, it fell into obscurity, concealed by the very traditions that were supposed to preserve it. This blog argues that Heidegger's critical "dest...

Sterile Preoccupation: Towards Technocracy and Loss of Human

William Blake, Newton (1795 ) Roland Barthes reminds us, looks us back from his grave, and constantly warns us about the mythological character of human life, our society, and the relationship of human with the life-systems, whereas symbolic profusions outweigh rational contemplation, emotive appeals are strategically manoeuvred for the deceptive promises and considerations, rhetorical narratives are deployed to symbolize the virtue of unbounded eloquences, significances, and exemplifying extravagances of meanings, ritualistic and mechanical productions of narratives, and seductions towards efficacy as instrumentalised worldview have relegated human relationships to the status of mechanization and technocratizations. What is so significant about the mechanisation of thinking and ritualistic institutionalisation? If not the loss of humanistic elements in the human relationships and the relationships of human species from their nature, ecosystem, and the life-systems itself. What is so p...